Keresés

Részletes keresés

spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 716

Professor Peter Wilson, Professorial Fellow, School of Mathematics and Statistics
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 715
Előzmény: spiroslyra (714)
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 714

Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità


Angelo Meriani

PROFESSORE ASSOCIATO
LINGUA E LETTERATURA GRECA
Settore: L-FIL-LET/02 - (ex L06C)

INSEGAMENTI:
- LETTERATURA GRECA (CdL Triennale in Filosofia)
- LINGUA ED ESEGESI DEL TESTO FILOSOFICO (CdL Specialistica in Filosofia)
- STORIA DELLA LINGUA GRECA (CdL Specialistica in Filologia Moderna)

FACOLTA' di LETTERE e FILOSOFIA

Sede:
Via Ponte don Melillo - 84084 Fisciano (SA) - Italia

tel: 089 962317; 320 7406237 - fax: 089 962133

email: a.meriani@unisa.it
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 713

Peter Wilson, University of Sydney (peter.wilson@arts.usyd.edu.au)
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 712

''M. carefully unmasks similar rhetorical misappropriations in the Republic passage and alerts us in doing so to the need for a full study of Plato's extensive antimusical rhetoric. Particularly good is the detailed analysis (pp. 106-110) of the image Sokrates develops to mock the harmonikoi in their attempt to identify the smallest perceptible musical interval (531): they 'torture' strings, putting them on the rack in pursuit of this utterly absurd enterprise. The only thing I missed in this discussion was comparison with the use of revealingly similar imagery, in full comic costume, by Mousike herself, recounting the abuse of her own 'strings' in Pherekrates' comedy Kheiron, fr. 155 K.-A. (Compare, for instance, Plato's use of the verb streblountas for the 'twisting on the pegs' of strings (531b) with the noun strobilon of Phyrnis' 'peg' at fr. 155.14.) In Pherekrates, the perpetrators of this torture are a group of (in)famous practising composers (among them Phrynis), and so the echoes ought to make us reflect further on just how close the relationship was between musical theory, practice, performance and the critical reaction they generated, in the later fifth century.

The way M. elucidates the frustration permeating Plato's text with the Pythagoreans' inability to push their musical studies further into the realm of mathematical abstraction brings home forcefully a paradox at the heart of Plato's relation to mousikê, broadly understood as performance and its accompanying discourses: its vast cultural authority and social usefulness meant that it could never be ignored, but neither could it be made to comply with Platonic idealism. Its analysis (let alone its practice) can never entirely depart from the empirical world of (sound)-perception, and attempts to make it do so will result in little more than a kind of mathematical mysticism: 'non c'è musica senza suoni, e senza musica non c'è teoria musicale', as M. well puts it (p. 105).

M. shows a rare combination of skills and interests: scholarly ease with a range of difficult, mostly fragmentary texts; sensitive reading of their generic conditions and rhetorical ploys; an understanding of the more technical issues of ancient music; and an ability to move the questions of debate beyond traditional topics and towards a greater appreciation of the ideological and historical factors that made Greek music the contested field it always was.''

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2005/2005-02-15.html.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 711

Αυτή είναι η προσωρινά αποθηκευμένη σελίδα της Google για την ιστοσελίδα http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/79514/index/9780521879514_index.htm. Πρόκειται για ένα στιγμιότυπο της σελίδας όπως εμφανίστηκε στις 25 Απρ. 2008 10:50:25 GMT. Από τότε, αυτή η σελίδα ενδέχεται να άλλαξε. Μάθετε περισσότερα »

Έκδοση μόνο κειμένου
Οι ακόλουθοι όροι αναζήτησης έχουν επισημανθεί: aristoxenus harmonikoi

Cambridge University Press
9780521879514 - The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece - by Andrew Barker
Index



Index of proper names



Academy, 326

Adrastus of Aphrodisias, 366n, 388n, 444

on classes of ratio 342n

on ratios of pitches 29n, 444n

Adrastus (legendary), 89

Aelianus 376n, 381n

Aetolians, and diatonic music, 70, 71

Agathocles, 73, 78, 87–8

Agenor, 40n, 52, 55, 78, 81–3

Akoumenos, 89

Alcidamas 69n

Alexander Polyhistor 85n

Alexanderson, B. 432n

Alypius, on notation, 61–6

Anacreon, 82

Anaxagoras, 327

Anaximenes, on ‘dense’ and ‘diffuse’ 25n

Anderson, W. D. 11n, 47, 47n, 48n, 51n

Annas, J. 311n

Apollo, 72

Archestratus 437n

on notes in the pyknon 217n

Archilochus, 85–6

Archytas, 113, 115, 143n, 143–5, 269, 287–307, 311, 321, 327, 329, 332–4, 336–7, 342, 343–4, 361, 364, 375, 390, 409, 440–2

and cosmology 305–6, 306n

on the Delian problem 304n

his divisions of the tetrachord, 288, 292–302, 352, 403–4

and genera, 38, 292–302

and mathematical (‘rational’) principles 288–307

as a mathematician, 304

and means and proportions, 284, 302–3, 332, 410

and musical practice, 294–302, 306–7, 443

personal qualities and achievements, 287

and Plato 287, 307, 316n

Ptolemy on, 287–302

references to instruments, 26

on sound and pitch, 27–9, 305–6, 322, 373, 419–21

his theorem on epimoric ratios, 272, 303–5, 351, 356, 382

Arimnestus, and the monochord 81n

Aristides Quintilianus, 397n, 398n, 400n, 435n, 442–3

on an ‘ancient’ notation, 64

Aristoxenian and Pythagorean elements in 441, 442n

on dynamis, 184, 188

on enharmonic 39n

on melopoiia, 230

the three ēthē of, 255–6

on notes in the pyknon 217n

on the paiōn epibatos 245n

on pre-systematic harmoniai, 45–52, 83, 393, 398

sources and transmission of his evidence, 45–8

on systematised harmoniai 44, 44n

on tonoi 216n, 225n, 226, 226n, 442n

Aristonikos 82, 98n

Aristophanes 6n, 83, 100n, 316n, 324n

Aristotle, 11, 33, 34n, 46, 114, 328–63, 364, 389n, 390, 409, 414n, 421, 426

Analytica posteriora 58n, 97, 105–12, 153, 167, 168, 173, 193n, 193–4, 198, 200, 292n, 353–61, 364, 377n, 410n

Analytica priora, 106

De anima, 28n, 173n, 241n, 332, 373n, 376n, 429–30

De caelo, 271n, 282, 283n, 286n, 323

Eudemus 329, 329n

frag. 47 Rose, 329–38

frag. 48 Rose 332n

De generatione animalium, 28n, 184n, 419

De generatione et corruptione 340n

Metaphysics 6n, 34n, 193n, 269n, 282n, 286, 349–53, 375n, 390n, 424n

Nicomachean Ethics 242n

De philosophia 329, 329n

Physics 112, 159, 379n

Poetics 6n, 235n

Politics 97, 100n, 234n, 244n, 245n, 248n, 251, 252, 253, 328,

Aristotle (cont.)

337–8, 393, 433

De sensu 34n, 97n, 289n, 291n, 338–48, 349–50, 362, 375n, 376n, 425n

On the Timaeus and Archytas, 333–4

and Archytas, 329, 332–4, 336–7

on concords and colours, 289n, 338–48, 362

on contemporary musical experts, 328

on dialektos 241n

on the diesis 349–53, 389n, 424, 425n

on dynamis, 184, 329

on ēthos, 245

fragment on harmonia, 329–38

its affinities with work of other writers, 331–3

analysis of, 334–8

its contexts in Aristotle and in [Plut.] De musica, 329–34

as expounding Pythagorean theories, 333–4

on harmoniai, 253, 292, 393

on harmonics, 328–63

empirical, 58n, 97, 104, 168, 292

mathematical 97, 167, 168, 286, 292, 328, 329–48, 410n

mathematical and empirical, relations between, 353–61

its methods and concepts, 328–9, 349–61

its purposes, 362

on the ‘harmony of the spheres’, 283n, 323

on hierarchies of skills 242n

on ‘mixed’ sciences, 353–61

on musical ethics 72, 248n

on music’s social utility, 251

names for ‘harmonics’, ‘metrics’ 6n

on nature (physis), 159–60

on Olympus 100n, 245n

on percept and concept, 173

on Philoxenus 244n

and Plato’s lecture on the good, 251

on Pythagoreans, 263, 282–3, 286, 329–38, 362

on ratios of concords 289, 291n

on scientific demonstration, 105–12, 168, 193–4, 198, 353–61, 377–8

silent on genera, 38

on sound and pitch, 28n, 373, 417, 419, 429–30

use of term harmonikos, 37

[Aristotle] De audibilibus 367n, 373n, 374n, 429n

[Aristotle] Problemata, 97n, 276n, 291n, 345–6, 348, 375n, 429n, 429–30

Aristoxenus, 12–16, 321, 327, 328–9, 331, 364, 373, 377–8, 388n, 390–1, 400, 404–6, 409, 410, 413, 432n, 434

On auloi 115n

Comparisons, 115

Elementa rhythmica, 7n, 115, 238

On instruments 115n

On Music, 115

On the piercing of auloi 115n

Praxidamantia, 115

Sympotic Miscellanies, 115

Elementa harmonica

composition and structure of, 113–35

as comprising Principles and Elements, 116n, 130, 134–5, 163, 164, 227

concepts, methods and aims, in Book I, 136–64

in Book II, 165–96

in Book III, 197–228

contexts and purposes of, 229–59

digressions in, theoretical and non-theoretical, 125–9, 133, 165, 213–14

discussed and quoted by Porphyry, 130n, 134–5

incompleteness of, and the missing portion, 115, 197, 200, 207–8, 215–28

as lectures, 122, 123

‘overlapping’ passages of Books I–II, 122, 124–34

programmes of Books I–II, 117–21

of Book II, 165

relations between the three books, 115–35

between Book III and the others, 121–2

as remnants of two treatises, 116–17

relations between them, 121, 123–34

as a single treatise 116n

and training for composers, 229–33

and Aristotle’s Lyceum, 114, 122, 123, 229, 231

and Aristoxenians, discussed by Ptolemaïs and Didymus, 438–40

on the harmonikoi see Agenor, Eratocles, Pythagoras of Zakynthos, and

General index s.vv. harmonics (empirical), harmonikoi

life and writings, 113–15

on mathematical harmonics, 143, 166–8, 390–1

musical writings, 115

as a musician, 113, 230

his musical conservatism, 46, 102, 230, 393

his names for ‘harmonics’, ‘metrics’, ‘rhythmics’, ‘organology’ 6n

and the nature and goals of harmonics, 180–3

in Nicomachus, 441

non-musical writings, 114–15

on percept and concept, 173–4

as a philosopher, 113–14, 258–9

on his predecessors, see General index s.v. harmonikoi

his public lectures, 231–3

and Pythagoreans, 113–14, 115, 166–8

contrasts and combinations with, 440–2

as source for Aristides Quintilianus, 46–8

and his students, 122, 123, 132–3, 251–2

and Theophrastus, 422–4, 426n, 427–8, 431, 435–6

Artemon, 74, 82

Athena, 83

nomos of 179n

Athenaeus of Athens (composer), 15n, 100n, 398–9

Athenaeus of Naucratis (author) 74, 78n

on Lamprocles, 83

on Stratonikos, 75

Avezzù, G. 69n

B Club 338n

Bacchius, 400n, 442–3

on harmoniai 44, 44n

on notes in the pyknon 217n

on types of composition 255n

Barbera, A., 366, 366n, 376n, 380–1, 382n, 383n, 386n, 391–2, 393, 394, 403

Barker, A. 7n, 21n, 36n, 48n, 80n, 85n, 97n, 101n, 145n, 224n, 225n, 232n, 271n, 288n, 291n, 296n, 301n, 306n, 308n, 317n, 325n, 330n, 342n, 344n, 347n, 350n, 367n, 373n, 377n, 392n, 408n, 414n, 430n, 434n, 442n, 444n

Barker, J. A. 223n, 295n

Barnes, J. 106n, 108n, 112, 155n

Bélis, A. 116n, 117, 119n, 120n, 134, 134n, 296n

Blumenthal, A. 98n

Blumenthal, H. von 438n

Boccadoro, B. 11n

Boethius, 382, 398, 437–8

and Nicomachus, 445, 446–7

on Philolaus, 271–5, 277–8, 281–2

credentials of his evidence, 271

Bolton, R. 106n, 155n

Bowen, A. C., on Archytas 29n

Bower, C. M. 281n, 382n, 398n, 447n

Brancacci, A. 69n

Burkert, W. 20n, 81n, 263, 304n

on Archytas 29n, 269n, 299n

on Hippocratics 281n

on numerology 282, 282n

on Philolaus 263n, 264, 271n, 272n, 273, 278n, 279n

Burnyeat, M. 317n

Byzantium, 438

Calcidius, 444

Callias, 74

Campbell, D. A. 79n, 80n, 83n

Cassin, B. 70n

Cleonides, 367n, 397n, 400n, 442–3

on concords 376n

on dynamis, 184, 188

on harmoniai 44, 44n

on melopoiia, 230

the three ēthē of, 255–7

on modulation 15n

on notes in the pyknon 217n

quotes Ion 98n

on tonoi 216n, 217–22, 226n

Creese, D. E. 27n, 81n, 306n, 409n, 442n

Damon 47, 72–3, 73n, 74, 87, 252, 310, 434n

Damoxenus 77n

Da Rios, R. 185n, 193n, 232n

Delian problem 304n

Delphi, 100n, 326, 398–9

Didymus (musical theorist) 288n, 442n

on distinctions between ‘schools’ of harmonics, 438–40

his divisions of the tetrachord, 293n, 296n, 438

and the monochord, 438

and Ptolemy, 438, 440n, 443–4

Diocles (historian of philosophy) 173n

Diocles (Pythagorean), 114

Diogenes Laertius, 333

on the ‘last’ Pythagoreans, 114

on persons named ‘Pythagoras’ 75n

on Theophrastus, 411

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 437

Dionysus, 72

Dolopes, and diatonic music, 70

Dracon, 78

Düring, I. 217n

Duris, on Simos and the monochord 26n, 81n, 409n

Echecrates, 114

Einarson, B., and P. H. De Lacey 244n, 259n, 335n

Empedocles

on colour 142n

on ‘dense’ and ‘diffuse’ 25n

on harmonia, 265

Epicurus, Epicureans 77n, 170, 185n

Epigonus, 52n, 78, 80, 81, 103

Eratocles, 40n, 43–55, 74, 78–9, 83–4, 88, 150, 152–4, 194–5, 223, 224

his treatise, 54

Eratosthenes, 306n, 437n, 438n, 442n, 445

Erinyes 282n

Eryximachus, 72n, 89, 279n, 280n, 345

Euclid, 107n, 197, 367–8, 384

[Euclid] Sectio canonis, 46, 107n, 358–60, 364–410

its aims, sources, strategies and readers, 382–4, 406–10

its author, 367–8

[Euclid] Sectio canonis (cont.)

on concords and their ratios, 289–90, 291n, 348, 357–8, 359–60, 372, 375–8, 384–8

on construction of ditones, 93n, 294n, 391–2, 409

its date, and supposedly later additions, 358, 364–5, 366–70, 391–4, 403–6

and diatonic, 276n, 290n, 392, 403–6

and division of the kanōn, 365–6, 369–70, 394–408

and empirical harmonics, 359–60, 389–91

and enharmonic, 369, 388–90, 391–4, 403–6

its introduction, 368–9, 370–8

limitations of, 409–10

and the kanōn, 365–6

division of, 365–6

necessity and ‘reasonableness’ in, 377–8

in Porphyry and Ptolemy, 289–90, 366–70, 391

and Pythagoreans, 373, 410

on sound and pitch, 28n, 370–5, 408, 416–18

structure of, 366

its theorems

harmonic, 359–60, 384–94

logical flaw in 357–8, 368n

mathematical, 356, 378–84

its title, 365

Euripides 39n, 89, 245n, 256n

Orestes score, 398–400

Eurytus, 114, 283

Eutocius 304n

Fortenbaugh, W. W., 411

Gamberini, L. 11n

Gaudentius, 442–3

Aristoxenian and Pythagorean elements in, 441

on experience as prerequisite for the study of harmonics, 181–2

Germain, G. 282n

Gerson, L. 448n

Gibson, S. 232n

Glaucon (in Republic), 23–5, 34, 77, 309–11, 315, 424–7

Glaucus of Rhegium, 78, 84–6, 98

as musical historian and theorist, 85–6

as public performer, 84–5

Gombosi, O. J. 226n

Gorgias, 77

his speeches at festivals 82n

Gottschalk, H. 330n, 367n, 373n, 414n, 429n

Hagel, S. 83n, 189n

Hankinson, R. 353n

Heraclides of Pontus (fourth century BC) 46, 330, 373n

Heraclides of Pontus (first century AD) 373n

Heraclitus, 265, 345

Hesiod, 87

Hesychius, 333

Hibeh Papyrus on music 40n, 69–73, 77, 233, 292, 393n, 426n

Hieron I of Syracuse, 82

Hippasus, 84–5, 306

Hippias, 73, 77

Hippocrates, Hippocratics

on abstract principles 104n

on ‘dense’ and ‘diffuse’ 25n

on harmonia and concords in embryology, 279n, 280–1

on ‘imitation’ 53n

Homer, 85, 87

Homeric Hymn to Hermes 276n, 316n

Huffman, C. A.

on Archytas 29n, 269n, 287n, 293n, 294n, 295n, 298n, 299n, 301n, 302n, 303n, 304n, 305, 305n, 307n, 316n, 333n, 364n

on Philolaus, 263n, 264, 271n, 273, 275n, 279n, 284

Iamblichus, 20, 283–5

Ion of Chios 98, 276n

Irwin, T. 155n

Isocrates 52n, 70n, 82, 255n

Jan, K. 366n, 367n, 371n, 394n

Joly, R. 280n

Juba (king and historian), 78n, 80

Kahn, C. H. 20n, 155n, 263n, 279n, 283n, 287n

Kerferd, G. B. 70n

Kirk, G. S., J. E. Raven and M. Schofield 279n

Knorr, W. 304n, 382n

Laloy, L. 193n, 376n

Lamprocles, 49–50, 78, 83–4, 87

Lamprus, 102

Landels, J. G. 59n

Lapini, W. 69n

Lasus, 19–20, 78, 79–80, 103

Lennox, J. 353n

Levin, F. R. 98n

Limenius, 398–9

Lippman, E. A. 11n, 413n, 414n, 434n

Lloyd, G. E. R. 106n

Long, A. A. 438n

and D. N. Sedley 170n, 173n, 185n

Lycaon 398n

Lyceum, 114, 122, 123, 229, 411, 420

Lysander of Sicyon, 80

Maas, M., and J. M. Snyder 74n

Macran, H. S. 61n, 137n, 169n, 231n, 252n

Mathiesen, T. J. 437n, 447n

Medusa, 347, 348

Melanippides, 79

Melissus, on ‘dense’ and ‘diffuse’ 25n

Metellus (or Megillus), 78

Middle Ages, 437

Mourelatos A. P. D. 315n

Moutsopoulos, E. 11n

Muses, 325

Mysians, of Philoxenus, 244, 253

Netz, R. 183n

Nicias 310n

Nicomachus 20, 326, 376n, 382n, 398, 398n, 408n

and Aristoxenus, 441

and Boethius, 445, 446–7

on concords 344–5, 376n

and definitions of ‘note’ 145n

and Philolaus, 271n, 273, 275, 276–7, 283

his writings on harmonics, 445–7

Olympus (musician), 85, 98–101, 245–6, 297, 405–6

his nomos of Athena, 245–6, 253

and the spondeiakos tropos, 246

survival of his music 100, 100n, 245n

Orpheus, 85

Orphic poetry 182n

Palisca, C. 438n

Panaetius the Younger 414n, 448n

Paquette, D. 74n

Parmenides, on ‘dense’ and ‘diffuse’ 25n

Pausanias, on Pronomus 56n

Pearson, L. 7n, 115n

Pericles, 47, 47n, 73n, 87, 88, 89

Persian Wars 309n

Perusino, F. 40n

Phaenias, on Stratonikos, 75–6, 103

Phanton, 114

Pherecrates 324n

Philochorus 80n

Philodemus, 432n, 437

Philolaus, 114, 263–86, 290, 305, 306, 311, 321, 331, 332–3, 336, 345, 409

Boethius on, 271–5

frag. 6a, 263–71

its argumentative structure, 266–71

and Boethius’ evidence, 273–5, 277–8, 281–2

and diatonic, 276–7

and enharmonic 273, 278, 292n

form of its attunement, 275–8

and other Philolaan fragments, 278–80

its terminology, 264–7

on limiters and unlimiteds 279–80, 312n

and means and proportions, 283–5

his purposes, and cosmology, 275, 278–86, 305–6

Philoxenus, 102, 244, 244n, 247, 248–9, 253

Phleious, Pythagoreans at, 114

Phrynis, 79, 104

Pindar 87, 102, 247, 248–9, 276n

Pisistratids, 82

Plato 11, 18, 269, 291, 306, 308–27, 332–3, 375, 414n

Alcibiades 87n

Charmides, 313

Cratylus 316n

Euthyphro, 313

Gorgias 6n, 139, 312n

Hippias Minor 82n

Ion 100n, 245n

Laches, 36n, 78, 87n, 308n, 310n, 313

Laws, 24n, 72n, 90–1, 96–7, 167n, 239–40, 245n, 250, 252, 309–10, 325, 326

Lysis 173n, 256n, 308n

Meno, 111n, 142n, 313, 314

Minos 100n

Phaedo 84, 308n

Phaedrus, 6n, 36, 88–90, 96–7, 259

Philebus, 33, 35–7, 57n, 90n, 96–7

Protagoras 73, 74, 78, 87, 308n

Republic, 6n, 23–9, 33, 34–7, 42, 45, 47, 72–3, 77, 92, 96–7, 137n, 245n, 248n, 250, 252, 307, 308–18, 325, 326, 328n, 332, 349, 350n, 355, 381n, 390n, 393, 406, 424–7

Seventh Letter 287, 312n

Symposium, 72n, 100n, 279n, 280n, 308n, 316n, 345

Theaetetus 414n

Timaeus, 3, 25n, 28n, 72n, 143n, 143–5, 167, 276n, 285, 289n, 290n, 307, 310, 311, 318–26, 331, 332, 333–4, 342, 344, 346, 352, 373n, 375n, 376n, 381n, 390, 406, 409, 419, 434–5, 444–5

on anamnēsis 111n

and Archytas 287, 307, 316n

Aristoxenus’ biography of, 115

on aulos-playing 57n

on composers and harmonics, 90–1

on ‘correctness’ and ‘excellence’, 239–40, 241

and Damon, 47, 72–3

on dianoia 173n

and diatonic, 276n, 292, 352

distinguishes harmonics, metrics, rhythmics 6n

distinguishes two approaches to harmonics, 23, 310–11, 355

and division of the tetrachord, 290

Plato (cont.)

on dynamis, 184

his early writings, 308

on empirical theorists, 23–5, 34–7, 68–9, 77, 92, 96–7, 104, 310–11, 349, 424–7

on ēthos, 245

and genera, 38, 406

on harmoniai, 45, 47, 292, 330, 393

his harmonic theories, 311, 315–27, 381

their intended audience, 326–7

their philosophical background, 311–15

on harmonikoi and mousikoi, 88–90

on knowledge and reality, 312–15

his lecture on the good, 251

life and writings 113–15, 312n

on mathematical theorists, 25–9, 307, 310–11

and means and proportions, 284, 285, 410

on melos 137n

on mimēsis 240n

on musical ethics, 72–3, 248n, 250, 308–11

on musical judgement, 90–1, 239–40, 241

and philosophy, 258–9

on musical sophists, 73

names for ‘harmonics’ 6n

on numbers as the subject of harmonics, 315–18

on Olympus 100n, 245n

in [Plut.] De musica, 330, 331

and Pythagorean harmonics, 29n, 310–11, 318

on ratios of concords, 289

on sound and pitch, 28n, 373, 417, 419

[Plato] Sisyphus, 76–7

Platonism, and harmonics in later antiquity, 444–5

Pliny 82n

Plotinus, 447–8

Plutarch, 326

on enharmonic in tragedy 40n, 393n

on the Timaeus 444, 444n

[Plutarch] De musica

Aristotelian fragment in, 329–38

chapters surrounding it, 330–3

on Aristoxenus, 46

his views on musical judgement, 235–59

on contemporaries of Aristoxenus, 65–6, 91–6

on enharmonic in tragedy 40n, 393n

and ‘following’ music, 173, 175

and Glaucus of Rhegium, 78, 85–6, 98

on Lamprocles and Mixolydian, 49, 78, 83–4

on mathematical harmonics, 330, 331–3

on musical ‘inventors’, 76

on Olympus, 98–9

on the ‘New Music’, 79

on Plato, 330, 331

on poiētikē, 139

on Pythoclides 87n

on spondeion and spondeiazōn tropos, 92, 100, 101n, 399–400

Pöhlmann, E., 62n, 64

and West 15n, 39n, 100n, 321n, 399n

Pollux, on the epigoneion 80n

Polymnastus, 114

Polystratus, 185n, 188

Porphyry 20, 28n, 122, 124n, 264n, 375n

on Archestratus 217n

on the Aristoxenian conception of vocal movement 144n

and Aristoxenus’ Elementa harmonica 134–5, 137n

quotes Aristoxenus on tetrachordal divisions 130n

his commentary on Ptolemy, its nature and purposes, 447–9

on Philolaus, 270

quotes Ptolemaïs and Didymus, 438–40

on Ptolemy’s ‘plagiarism’, 438, 440n, 448

on schools of harmonic theory 52n, 79n

and the Sectio canonis, 366–70

on Theophrastus, 411–14, 433, 436

Porter, J. 20n, 41n, 79n, 235n

Potiron, H. 61n

Pratinas, 102, 247

Presocratics, 24–5, 53, 265, 279, 318–23, 327, 345

Priscian, on Theophrastus 429n

Privitera, G. A. 19n, 79n

Proclus, 326, 367n, 444

Prodicus, 66, 77

Pronomus, and auloi 56n

Prophrastus 398n

Protagoras, 73, 77, 87

Psellus, on enharmonic in tragedy 40n, 393n

Ptolemaïs 388n, 437n, 443n

on ‘schools’ of harmonics, 438–40, 443

Ptolemy 306n, 332, 361, 388n, 397n, 429n, 430n

on Archytas, 287–302

on Aristoxenus, 441–2

and astronomy, 444

on auloi 57n

on chromatic 299n

on concords and ratios 342–4, 347, 375n, 377n

and Didymus, 438, 440n, 443

on dynamis, 184

and thesis, 188

on enharmonic 39n

and experimental tests, 407–8, 443–4

on melodic accuracy 412n

on modulation, 219

on the monochord 407n

and musical practice, 443–4

on perfect systems 16n

on pitch 28n

Porphyry’s commentary on, 447–9

principles of his analyses

rational, 288–9, 291

rational and perceptual, 441–2, 443–4

on Pythagoreans, 342–4, 367, 441–2

and the Sectio canonis, 289–90, 367–70

on the soul, 444

and the theorem on epimoric ratios 304n

on tonoi, 216n, 224–7

on types of composition 255n

on the vocal mechanism 412n

on weights and pitches 22n

Pythagoras of Samos (philosopher), 19–20, 446–7

Aristoxenus on, 114, 115

and the ‘harmonious blacksmith’ 22n

and the monochord 26n

Pythagoras of Zakynthos (musician and theorist), 40n, 52, 55, 74–5, 77, 78, 81–3

Pythagoreans, 11, 20, 22, 33, 37, 40, 58–9, 88, 263–86, 287–307, 329–38, 354, 367, 373, 375

see also Archytas, Eurytus, Hippasus, Philolaus

and acoustics, 80

and Aristoxenus, 113–14, 115, 146, 167

contrasts and combinations with, 440–2

on concords and ratios, 342–4

discussed by Ptolemaïs and Didymus, 438–40

extremists and moderates, 440, 443

fundamental theses of, 59

and the ‘harmony of the spheres’ 283n, 286n

and later harmonic theory, 445–7

and measurement of intervals, 25–30

in mainland Greece, 114

and musical practice, 295

and number-symbolism, 281–3

Plato and Pythagorean harmonics, 25–9, 310–11, 318

Pythoclides, 73, 78, 87–8

Rankin, H. D. 70n

Renaissance, 438

Robbins, F. E. 368n

Rocconi, E. 71n, 267n, 269n

de Romilly, J. 70n

Rossi, L. E. 11n

Sachs, C. 81n

Sappho 87n

Sectio canonis see [Euclid]

Sedley, D. N. see Long

Sextus Empiricus 397n

Sicking, C. M. J. 412n, 414n, 415n, 417n, 419n, 422n, 423–4, 426n, 427n, 433n, 434n

Sifakis, G. M. 82n

Simonides, 87

Simos, 26n, 81

Smith, R. 106n

Snyder, J. M. see Maas

Socrates, 23, 34, 35–6, 47, 66–7, 74, 76–7, 88–90, 90n, 142n, 250, 307, 308n, 309–11, 315–16, 327

Aristoxenus’ biography of, 115

see also Plato

Solomon, J. 218n, 226n, 367n

Sophocles, 89

Sorabji, R. 350n

Stesichorus, 83n, 85–6

Stobaeus, 273, 279

Stoics, on percept and concept, 173–4

Strasburger, H. 98n

Stratonikos, 75–7, 78

and harmonic theory, 75–6, 86–7, 103

Strauss, R. 254n

Striker, G. 438n

Suda

on Aristoxenus 114, 114n

on Lasus, 79

Tannery, P. 273, 371n

Taras (Tarentum) 113, 296n

Tarrant, H. 448n

Telephanes, and auloi 56n

Telesias, 102, 247–9, 257–8

Telestes, 115

Terpander, 85–6

Thaletas, 85–6

Thebes, auletes of, 102

Theon of Smyrna, 3, 326, 366n, 397n, 408n, 444

on the characters of the genera 179n

on Lasus, 79

on the theorem on epimoric ratios 304n

Theophrastus 46, 114, 374n, 411, 448n

and Aristotle, tactful treatment of, 421

and Aristoxenus, 422–4, 426n, 427–8, 431, 435–6

on attunement, emmeleia and melōidia, 431–3

on empirical harmonics, 97, 421–8

his Harmonics, 411, 413n, 435–6

on harmonikoi, 74, 422–7

life and works, 411

on mathematical harmonics, 97, 364, 412–21

his On Music, 411

fragment from, 411–36

on music and soul, 411–13, 433–6

Theophrastus (cont.)

and Plato’s Republic, 424–7

on reeds of auloi 56n

his theory of pitch, 413, 428–31

Thrasyllus 366n, 375n, 400n, 404, 444, 445, 448n

his division of the kanōn 395–8, 400, 401n, 401–3, 404n, 444n

on ratios of pitches 29n, 408n

Timaeus of Locri, 445

Timotheus, 102, 104, 247

Vitruvius, 437

Wallace, R. 47n, 234n

Weil, H. and T. Reinach, 335

West, M. L. 15n, 18, 47n, 48n, 56n, 59n, 61n, 62n, 63n, 64n, 69n, 73n, 80n, 81, 82n, 86, 86n, 98n, 100n, 182n, 269n, 393n, 399n, 400n

and Pöhlmann see Pöhlmann

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 48n, 51n, 64n, 101n, 226n, 294n, 298n, 398n

World-Soul see General index s.v. soul

Xenocritus, 85–6

Xenophilus, 114

Yamamoto, T. 116n

Zanoncelli, L. 182n, 366n, 445n

Zedda, S. 319n



General index



accompaniment, 7n, 101n, 240, 241n, 246, 399–400

acoustics, 7n, 79–80, 84, 141, 146, 193, 305–6, 370–5, 407–8

see also pitch, sound

agōgē (‘consecution’) 132

anamnēsis 111n

apodeixis see demonstration

apotomē 272–4, 275, 277–8, 351–2

ratio of, 272, 352

‘appearances’ (phainomena)

as subject-matter of harmonics, 141–3, 148, 149–50, 166–8, 193n, 428, 435–6

and principles, 168, 193

see also perception

appropriateness (oikeiotēs), 241, 242, 243–59

arithmētikē (‘number theory’), 7n, 315, 353–6

arrangement (schēma)

of concords see species

in enharmonic genus, 39

astronomy, 10, 11, 315, 323, 334

and harmonics, ‘sisters’ 332n

attunement

and emmeleia and melōidia, 431–3

and melody 7–8, 172n

and scale 8n

‘ten-step’ 98

see also harmonia, systēmata

aulos, 26, 27, 28, 420

articulation and concordance of 241–2

pitching of notes on, 57

range of, 126

ratios of sounding-lengths, 58–9

syrinx of, 126

and theories of the harmonikoi, 55–6, 57–60

axioms, 108, 112

see also principles

beats, 297–8

bull-roarer see rhombos

character, human

music’s effects on, 250, 251–4, 255–6, 257, 309

see also soul (human)

see also ethics, ēthos

choruses, 90, 91

chromatic see genus

comedy, 327

harmonics in, 77

commensurable, incommensurable, 288–91, 292, 339–42, 343–5

competitions, musical, 239

composers, 10, 90–1, 102, 244–5

training of, 75–6, 86–7, 102–3, 104, 229–33, 247–9, 257–8

composition (as an activity)

melodic (melopoiia), 66, 120, 139, 140, 230–3, 252

and the telos of harmonics, 230–3

three ēthē of, 255–7

of music in all its aspects (poiētikē), 138–40

compositions

Dorian, 246–7

ēthos of see ēthos

evaluation of see judgement

harmonic analysis of, 11, 90–1, 102–3, 175, 236–43

particular examples, 100–1, 244, 245–6

as musical ‘ends’, 241–2

styles of, 175, 178, 232, 245–6, 247–9, 297

concords (symphōniai)

in accompaniments 101n

blending of notes in, 298, 344–5, 372, 375–6, 419

and colours, 289n, 338–48, 362

added to concords, 127

added to octave, 126, 127

in construction of discords (‘method of concordance’), 65–6, 93, 94, 121, 157, 158, 294n, 299, 321, 445

definition of, in Aristoxenus, 189–91

concords (symphōniai) (cont.)

distinction from discords, problems in, 346–8, 357–8

in embryology, 280–1

forms of see species

largest and smallest, 119, 125–7

little or no variation in magnitude, 93, 189–91

and mathematical means see means

notes of, equal in power, 419, 420

number and identities of, 125–7, 348

‘in numbers’, ‘numbers in’ see numbers

ratios of see ratios

recognition of, 65–6, 156, 190, 294n, 297–8

relative measurement of, 25

species of see species

see also fourth, fifth, octave, symphōnos

conjunction (synaphē), 12, 14, 53–4, 98, 186, 191–2, 198, 199, 208–9

constant and changing elements in music, 170–2, 245–6

continuity (to syneches, synecheia)

and the harmonikoi, 162

of melodic sequences, systēmata, 42, 103, 118, 130, 161–4, 238–9

of rhythmic sequences, 238–9

of sequences of speech-sounds, 161, 238–9

see also succession

cosmology, 265, 275, 278–86, 305–6, 318–23

criterion, of judgement, 438–40

see also judgement, perception, reason

criticism, musical see judgement

cyclic rearrangement of intervals see harmoniai (Eratoclean)

demonstration (apodeixis)

in Aristotle, 105–12, 193–4, 328–9, 353–61

and explanation, 107

logical form of, 106

premises of, 106–11
colontruerunontrue

cannot be demonstrated 106–7, 194, 358, 377–8;

true of subject ‘in itself’, 108–9

principles of, 106–7, 108, 110–12, 353–61, 377–8

prohibition of ‘kind-crossing’, 109–10, 167–8, 353–61

see also ‘same domain’ rule

in Aristoxenus’ harmonics, 105, 122, 124–34, 135, 150, 152–5, 166, 167–8, 192–6, 197–228, 328–9, 377–8

and ‘agreement’, 193, 195–6

hierarchy of, 154, 193, 194–5

and perception, 154–5, 166, 167–8, 193–4

preconditions of, 192–6

in mathematical harmonics, 167

neglect of by harmonikoi, 41, 104, 166

principles of, in harmonics see principles

see also theorems

determinacy, of propositions in harmonics, 186, 213–14

diagrams

of harmonikoi, see harmonikoi

in Sectio canonis, 380–1, 395

of Stratonikos, 75–6

dialektos, of instruments 241n

dianoia (‘thought’), its role in Aristoxenus’ harmonics, 168–9, 171–5

non-discursive, 173–4

as ‘meaning’ 173n, 184n

as simultaneous with perception, 173–4, 237–8

training of, 171

diaschisma, 273, 274, 278

diastellein and systellein, meanings of, 256

diastēma

in Archytas and Aristotle 379n

in Philolaus, 270

in Sectio canonis, 378–9

see also intervals, ratios

diatonic see genus

diatonos hypatōn, in Sectio canonis, 395, 397, 398–400

diesis

in Aristotle 349–53, 389n, 424, 425n

two dieses in mathematical harmonics, 350–3

in aulos-playing, 269–70

chromatic, 156, 157

enharmonic, 91–3, 157

successions of, 42–3

as unit of measurement, see measurement

see also quarter-tone

in Philolaus, 264, 266n, 268–70, 272–5, 276–8, 281, 321

as minor semitone, 269

its ratio, 269, 272

see also semitone, leimma

as unspecified small interval, 269

discords, 372, 386

in accompaniments, 99–100

constructed through concords, see concords

variable in magnitude 93, 190, 294n

discs, used as instruments, 27, 84–5

disjunction (diazeuxis), 12, 14, 43, 53–4, 98, 186, 191–2, 198, 199, 206, 208–9, 320

in Mixolydian, 49–50

dithyramb 79, 83, 244, 244n

ditone

composite and incomposite, 101n, 177

constructed through concords, 92n, 93n, 294n, 391–3, 409

counterparts of, in chromatic and diatonic, 205n, 205–6, 210–13

in enharmonic, 38, 43, 99, 177, 235, 296–8

progressions from, 206

relations with pyknon, 205, 208, 209–10

relations with tone, 205–6

sequences of, 101n, 205, 209–10, 212

use of the term, in El. harm. Book, 3 205n, 205–6, 210–12

division

of kanōn see kanōn

of tetrachord see tetrachord

dynamis

of appropriateness, 244

of harmonia, in Aristotle, 329

kritikē 238

see also judgement

as melodic ‘function’, in Aristoxenus, 116, 120, 121, 122, 123–134, 171, 175, 183–92, 213–16, 427

bearers of, 169n, 191–2

and hearing, and dianoia, 168–9

occurrences of in El. harm., quoted, 185–6

and perceived ‘character’, 192, 196

non-musical meanings, 184–5

in other musical writers, 184, 188

and thesis, 188

see also notes

ear, see hearing

education, 324

of children, 309, 311, 330

see also ethics

of musicians, see musicians

of philosophers, 311–15, 318

elements (stoicheia), the term’s use in Aristoxenus, 134–5, 163, 164, 227

elite and popular taste, 234, 259

emmelēs and ekmelēs (‘melodic’ and ‘unmelodic’), 101n, 160, 234, 420, 431–2

emotion

expression of, 248–9, 250, 253–4

release from, 411

empiricists see harmonics (empirical)

enaulos kitharisis, 80

enharmonic see genus

enumeration and analysis, 52, 81, 150–2

epagōgē see induction

epideixeis (‘displays’), 69, 71, 73–5, 76–7, 82, 104, 232

epigoneion, 80–1

epogdoic (epogdoos), in Philolaus, 264, 266–7, 270

see also tone

equality

in Aristotle’s Politics, 337–8

of intervals see intervals

‘of measure’ and ‘in number’, 334–5

ethics, 11–12, 70–1

in Aristoxenian theory, 239, 249–59

and musical structure, 72–3

in Plato’s musical theories, 250, 308–11

and harmonics, 309–11

ēthos

arising from composers’ treatment, 244, 245–7, 254–5

of compositions and performances, 241, 242, 243–59

of definable musical elements, 245, 254–5

diastaltikon, systaltikon, hēsychastikon, 255–7

and the genera, 179–80, 244

and human character, 249–59

see also ethics

and mixis and synthesis, 245–6

as a musical or ‘aesthetic’ category, 179n, 251, 253, 257–9

evaluation

of music see judgement

in Plato’s harmonics, 317–18

in Plato’s philosophy see values

experience (empeiria), 111

as prerequisite for the study of harmonics, 179–83, 203

facts and explanations, in Aristotle, 353–61

see also demonstration

fifth

names of, 22, 264–5, 280–1

quantified by Philolaus, 268

size of, 359, 360, 388–90

species of, see species

see also interval, ratio

‘following’ music, 103, 172–5, 236–9

see also understanding

form (eidos, schēma), of concords see species

forms, in Plato, 313, 314, 318

fourth

divisions of, 38

names of, 22, 264–5, 280–1

size of

according to Aristoxenus, 121, 127, 129, 190, 359, 390

according to Philolaus, 268

in Sectio canonis, 359, 360, 388–90

species, arrangements of, see species

see also interval, ratio, tetrachord

‘fringe’ performances, 82

function, melodic see dynamis

genus (genos), 14, 38, 103, 118, 120, 125, 150, 170, 175, 176, 198, 199

chromatic

in Archytas, 293–4, 295, 298–9
colontruerunontrue

construction of, from diatonic, 298–9

contains a pyknon, 200–1, 202–3

indeterminacy of, 70–1

‘hemiolic’ 94, 158n

in later mathematical harmonics, 444–5, 446

perceived character of, 179–80, 192, 196

genus (genos), chromatic (cont.)

and Philolaus, 273, 278

‘soft’ 94, 158n, 211

in Ptolemy 299n

structure of 38, 101n

‘tonic’ 212

treatment of, in El. harm. Book, 3 205n, 205–6, 212–13

concept of, and Aristoxenus, 404–5

development and precursors of the concept, 71n, 404–6

diatonic

in Archytas, 293, 294, 298–9

assimilation to chromatic, 70–1

its counterparts for ditone and pyknon, 206, 212–13

lacks the pyknon, 179n, 200–1, 202–3

in later mathematical harmonics, 444–5, 446

in Philolaus, 276–7, 292

in Plato, 276n, 321, 406, 444–5

in Sectio canonis, 276n, 392, 403–7

‘soft’ 158n

structure of 38, 294n

divisions of tetrachords in see tetrachords

earliest allusions to, 38–9, 70–1

earliest analysis of, 292

enharmonic

in Archytas, 293, 296–8

admired by Aristoxenus, 40, 91, 128, 297, 393

by ‘fraudulent’ harmonikoi, 70–1

by Olympus, 99

contains a pyknon, 200–1, 202–3

difficulty of, 39–40

‘distorted’ in fourth century, 39, 128, 235, 297–8

earliest form of, 98–101, 297

in fifth century, 40

and the harmonikoi, 37–41, 48, 100, 236, 292, 392–3

in later mathematical harmonics, 444–5, 446

and Olympus, 98–101, 245–6, 297, 405–6

and Philolaus 273, 278, 292n

and Plato and Aristotle, 393, 406

rejected by some of Aristoxenus’ contemporaries 65–6, 91–6, 297n

in the Sectio canonis, 369, 388–90, 391–4, 403–5

structure of, 38

in tragedy, 40, 70, 71, 393

ethical attributes of, 70–1, 72–3

as first topic in harmonics, 122, 124, 134

mixtures of, 118, 125

modulation of, 177–8

see also modulation

non-technical discrimination of, 72

and notation, 62, 175

not recognised as such, 404–6

origin of the term 405n

perceived characters of, 171–2, 178–80

relative ages of 99, 160n

‘shades’ (variants) of, 14, 171–2, 178–80, 200, 206, 212

see also tetrachords (divisions of)

geometry

and Aristoxenian harmonics, 169–70, 203

in Plato, 315

‘golden age’ of music 309n

harmonia

‘body’ of, 335

in cosmology, 265

divine, 326, 329

in embryology, 280–1

as enharmonic genus, 37–8, 236n, 393

as musical attunement, 37–8

and the number 10 (the decad), 282–3

as octave attunement, 264, 265, 268, 329, 332–3

see also octave

its ‘parts, magnitudes and excesses’, 334–7

in Philolaus, 264, 265, 268, 279–80, 345

in plural, harmoniai 38n

Aristotle on, 253

and education, ethics, 97, 309–11

Eratoclean (‘cyclic’), and Aristides’ pre-systematic forms, 43–55, 74, 83–4, 153, 194–5, 224

Dorian, 49, 54n, 398, 399–400

Hypolydian 54n

Iastian (‘Ionian’), 50–1

Lydian, 50, 51

Mixolydian, 49–50, 54n, 83–4, 87

names of 44, 44n, 45n

Plato on, 45, 47, 239, 250, 309–11, 330

pre-systematic, sources of Aristides’ evidence, 45–8

and the senses, 332

harmonics

agenda of, 6–11, 244

Aristoxenian and Pythagorean, contrasted and combined, 440–2

and arithmetic, 353–6

autonomy of, in Aristoxenus, 149–50, 434, 435–6

and composition see composers, composition

and Dorian compositions, 246–7

empirical, 10–11, 23–5, 29–30, 33–67, 68–104, 105, 136–64, 165–96, 197–228, 229–59, 349–51, 443–7

Theophrastus’ criticisms of, 413, 421–8

see also appearances, harmonikoi, perception

as evaluative, 317–18

in later centuries, 5, 46–7, 259, 389, 391, 404, 410, 437–49

its relations with earlier harmonics, 437

treatises on, Aristoxenian, 442–3

mathematical, 443–7

manuals of, 392

mathematical, 25–30, 59, 79, 84, 143, 166–8, 193, 263–86, 287–307, 315–27, 328, 329–48, 350–3, 364–410, 435n, 443–7, 449

complete treatises in, 364

mixed resources of, 384–5

Theophrastus’ criticisms of, 412–21

see also mathematics, numbers, ratios, reason

mathematical and empirical

compared, contrasted, 9, 18, 29–30, 37, 52n, 58–9, 96–7, 143, 166–8, 291–2, 310–11, 389–91, 440–2

mixed approaches, 271, 272, 274–5, 440–2

relations between, 353–61, 362–3, 389–91

see also harmonics (‘schools’ of)

and musical judgement, 233–59

and musical practice, 4, 11, 40, 48, 55–6, 66, 69–70, 74–5, 78–96, 97–104, 125–6, 129, 133, 275–6, 294–302, 306–7, 326, 443–4, 446–7

nature and goals of, in Aristoxenus, 180–3, 229–59

objectivity of, 170

origins of, 19–20

Plato’s treatment of, 308–27

and later harmonics, 443, 444–5

its intended audience, 326–7

its philosophical background, 311–15

in Republic, 311, 315–18

in Timaeus, 311, 318–26

principles of see principles

its relations with other disciplines, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 149–50, 409

see also acoustics, arithmētikē, astronomy, cosmology, geometry, history, linguistics, mathematics, medicine, metrics, natural science, philosophy, rhythmics

‘schools’ of 52n, 79n

distinguished, 438–42

see also harmonics, mathematical and empirical

scope and limits of, in Aristoxenus, 103, 236–43

sources of evidence on, 5–6, 19–20, 33–4

status of, 7, 104, 105, 137–8, 229, 259, 291–2

terminology of, 9, 20–3, 24–5

unity of, in Aristoxenus, 192, 195–6, 228

harmonikoi (predecessors of Aristoxenus), 37–67, 68, 310, 350n, 354, 390–1

Aristoxenus’ attitude to, 41, 136

Aristoxenus’ essay on, 33n, 39n, 122, 123

as composers and performers, 78–96, 97–104

their diagrams, 39, 41–3, 45–8, 65, 74, 75–6, 86–7, 141, 153, 162

differences between, 40–1

exclusive concern with enharmonic, 37–41, 48, 100, 236, 292, 392–3

failures of enumeration, 52, 81

failures of observation, 153, 166–7

and fraudulent ‘harmonikoi’, 69–73

historical works of, 49, 83, 98–101

see also Index of proper names s.v. Glaucus

incompetence of, 39

and instruments, 55–6, 57–60

see also aulos, epigoneion, tripous

and knowledge of ratios, 58–9

and measurement see measurement

methodological failings of, 150, 152–4, 155–6, 157

and mousikoi, 88–90, 98–9

and musical practice, 40, 48, 78–96, 97–104, 326

and musicians’ training, 75–6, 86–7, 102–3, 104, 229

names of, listed, 78

neglect of demonstration and principles, 41, 52, 55, 57–8, 104, 153, 166–7

and notation, 56, 60–7, 68, 74, 77

and octave systems, 39, 43–4, 52, 127n, 321

on Olympus, 98–101

and other practical skills, 89, 104

and philosophers, mathematicians, intellectuals, 34, 66–7, 79, 96–7, 104

public profile of, 68–78, 82–3, 85, 103–4

punning use of the term, 37–8

purposes of, 96–104

and sophists, 68–78, 87–8

Theophrastus on, 422–4

on the tonoi, 55–6, 216

see also Index of proper names s.vv. Agenor, Eratocles, Pythagoras of Zakynthos

harmonikos, uses in Plato and Aristotle, 36–7

harmonious blacksmith 22n, 446n

harmony, 7

‘of spheres’, 149, 283, 286n, 318, 323

hearing (akoē)

and analysis of compositions, 100

as criterion, 23–4, 29, 30, 86, 424–5

its objects, 168–9, 174

and perception, in Aristoxenus, 169n, 174–5

purpose and workings of, 325–6, 332

its role in Aristoxenian harmonics, 168–9, 172–3, 174–5

see also perception

hermēneia 242, 411n

see also performance

to hērmosmenon (‘that which is attuned’), in Aristoxenus, 161, 240

history, musical, 49, 83, 85–6, 98–101, 125–9, 133

hypatē (hypata), in Philolaus, 264, 265–6

hyperhypatē 398–400

independent of genus, 398–9

see also diatonos hypatōn

hyperochē (mathematical ‘excess’), 270

imitation

of composers’ styles, 85–6

see also mimēsis

impacts in sound-production

coincident and non-coincident, 374–5

frequency of, 370–5, 408, 416–18

induction (epagōgē), 112, 143, 149, 378

and composition, 249

instruments

construction of, and the tonoi, 55–6

eight-stringed, seven-stringed, 276

eleven-stringed, 98

experimental use of, 407–8

makers of, 59, 60

in Plato, 309

power used in note-production, 418–19

range of, 126, 321

and theories of harmonikoi, 55–6, 57–60, 69–70, 81, 82–3

used in mathematical harmonics, 26–7

see also kanōn, monochord

‘voice’ of, see voice

see also aulos, epigoneion, kanōn, kithara, lyre, monochord, Panpipes, rhombos, simikion, tripous, vessels, zither

intervals (diastēmata), 118, 120

as causes of difference in pitch, 422–7, 428

composite and incomposite, 101n, 118, 122, 123, 132, 175, 177, 199, 202

content of, 423–7, 432–3

differences between, 125, 150, 151, 154–5

diversity of, 8

equal and unequal, 43, 162, 178

familiar, 156

identified by reference to notes, 177, 199, 206, 427

to positions in the system, 264–5, 268, 274

irrational, 95

and larger numbers, 29–30

largest and smallest 34n

‘left out’, 423–7, 432–3

as linear distances, 23–5, 29, 51, 59

magnitudes of, see magnitudes

measurement of, see measurement

melodic synthesis of, 118, 131, 150, 154–5, 160–1

minimal, 23, 34–5, 42, 92, 155–6, 162, 424–6

see also diesis, measurement (unit of)

odd and even, 65–6, 94, 95

quantitative descriptions of

in El. harm. Book III, 198, 200, 210–12

Theophrastus’ critique of, 412–28

as ratios see pitch-relations, ratios

sequences of see succession

sizes of see magnitudes

as spatial, spaces, 144n, 422n, 423–4

see also pitch-relations, ratios

judgement, musical, 139–40, 233–59

of ends and means, 241–3

and ethical, 249–59

and philosophy, 258–9

and social utility, 251

see also appropriateness, ēthos

kalos (‘fine’, ‘beautiful’)

in Aristotle 235n

in Aristoxenus, 234–5, 247, 257–8

in Plato, 239–40

in Pythagorean theory, 342

kanōn, 365–6

division of in Sectio canonis, 365–6, 369–70, 394–408

constructing the ‘immutable’ systēma, 394–401

constructing the movable notes, 401–3

and diatonic, 403–7

enharmonic impossible, 403–4

geometrical conception of, 407

knowledge presupposed by, 406–9

mathematical and musical bases of, 394, 395–403

physical basis of, 407–8

use of instrument in, 407–8

division of by Thrasyllus, 395–8, 400, 401n, 401–3

see also monochord

katapyknōsis, 41–3, 56n, 162

keys see tonoi

kithara 74, 80, 87, 398n

knowledge

and reality, in Plato, 312–15

scientific, 105–12

see also demonstration

komma, 273, 274, 277–8

kritikos, in Aristoxenus, 240–1, 254

see also judgement

law of fourths and fifths (abbreviated as L), 131, 160–1

and Aristoxenus’ theorems, 198–9, 201–2, 204, 209, 212

see also principles

leimma, 294n, 299, 321, 351–2

division of, 445n, 446

see also diesis, semitone

lichanos

a ditone below mesē, 128, 235, 297

dynamis of, 188

identity of, 128

infinite in number, 129, 130, 158, 211

melodic role of, 163

omission of 99–100, 100n

positions and ranges of, 128, 129–30, 142–3, 144, 158–9

limit and the unlimited

in Aristotle, 332

in Philolaus, 279–80

linguistics, 66

lyre

movements in its sound-box, 430

nine-stringed 398n

seven-stringed, 276

tuning of, 15, 44, 264–5

magnitudes (‘sizes’)

of intervals, 125, 264–5, 267, 388–90

and Aristoxenian theory, 61, 66, 158, 164, 168–9, 171, 175–80, 185–6, 206, 207, 427–8

grasped by hearing, 168–9, 174

incomposite, 132

and notation, 61–5, 175

in Philolaus, 264–5, 268, 271, 272–5, 285–6

in theories of harmonikoi, 61

of pitched sounds, 418

of systems, 39

see also measurement

mathematical harmonics, see harmonics (mathematical)

mathematics, 7n, 197–8

and Archytas’ harmonics, 288–302

evaluative aspects of, 317–18, 342–8

in Plato, 312–13, 314, 317–18

the five mathematical disciplines, 315

see also harmonics (mathematical)

means, mathematical

in Archytas, arithmetic, geometric, harmonic, 302–3, 320, 331–3, 336–8

in Aristotle frag. 47 Rose, arithmetic and harmonic, 329, 334–8

in Aristotle’s Politics, arithmetic and harmonic, 337–8

geometric, 337–8

and construction of concords, 302

and Philolaus, arithmetic, 283–4

harmonic, 283–4

in [Plut.] De musica, 331

in Sectio canonis, 380

in the Timaeus, arithmetic and harmonic, 319–20, 331–2

geometric 320n

see also proportion

measurement

of auditory phenomena, by ear, 23–4, 30, 34–5, 155–9, 349–51, 424–5

of intervals, 9, 20–30, 65–6, 155–9, 168–9, 349–53

linear, 23–5, 274

see also magnitudes

by ratios, 25–9, 266–7, 268, 269–71, 272–5, 350–3

by division of ratios, 352–3

see also ratios

by reference to the tone, 156–9

two approaches to, 9, 23

compared, 29–30

mixed, 271, 272, 274–5

unit of

in harmonics, 23–4, 29, 34–5, 42, 65–6, 92, 94, 155–9, 349–53, 389, 424–6

as indivisible, 349–50, 350n, 424

in ratios, 288–9, 344, 350–3

in rhythms, 349

medicine, medical writers 11, 89, 104, 104n

harmonia and concords in embryology, 279, 280–1

melodic and unmelodic see emmelēs

melody, 7, 118

analysis of, 100–1, 102–3

as coming-into-being, 172–3

common to the genera, 125

and genus, 38, 125

inspirational, 100

nature of see melos

notation of, see notation

orderliness of, 142–3, 228

and scales, attunements, 7–8, 62–3

melōidia (melodic singing), 163, 431–3

see also singing, voice

melopoiia see composition, melodic

melos

meanings of, 62–3, 137–8

nature of (and of vocal movement, of to hērmosmenon, etc.), 118, 146n, 149–50, 155, 159–64, 166, 189, 192, 228

see also melody

memory

in establishment of principles, 111

its role in Aristoxenian harmonics, 172–3

mesē

dynamis of, 214

melodic role of, 163

in Philolaus (messa), 264, 265–6

‘method of concordance’ see concords

methodology

Aristotle on, 349–61

Aristoxenus on, 120, 121, 122, 123, 135, 136–59, 164, 165–96

condition of completeness, 150–2, 153

metrics, 6, 176

agenda of, 6

mimēsis (‘imitation’), 53, 90–1, 240n, 309, 325, 326

mixture (mixis)

of musical elements, 238, 254

and ēthos, 245–6

and synthesis 238n

modulation

melodic 12, 15, 15n, 16n, 55, 87, 118, 120, 122, 124n, 171, 175, 177–8, 215–28, 244, 338n

through concords and tones, 218, 222, 225

through the octave, 219

rhythmic, 245–6

monochord, 26, 81n, 365–6, 394, 407–8, 409n, 438

see also kanōn

mousikos

in Aristoxenus, 138, 139–40, 233, 240

uses of the term, 36, 88–90, 98–9, 139–40

movement see singing, sound, voice

melody-making see soul (human)

music

as coming-into-being, 172–3

evaluative attributes of, 234–5, 238, 239–40, 243, 257–8

and appropriateness and ēthos, 243–59

and ethical attributes, 249–59

see also judgement

and movement of the soul see soul (human)

musical and unmusical

as an evaluative distinction, 317

as a mathematical distinction, 291–2, 317

objectiveness of the distinction, 10

see also composers, composition, musicians

musicians, 296n, 409

and musical judgement 139n

training of, 75–6, 86–7, 102–3, 104, 229–33, 247–9, 257–8

their uses of harmonic theory, 96–104

see also composers, harmonics (and musical practice)

vocabulary of, 9, 264–5, 267, 268, 269–70, 274

natural science, and Aristoxenian harmonics, 149–50, 229

nature (physis)

in Aristotle, 159–60

and artefacts, 159–60

of melos and related conceptions see melos

nētē (neatē), in Philolaus, 264, 265–6

nētē synēmmenōn, in Sectio canonis, 395, 397–8, 399–400

‘New Music’, 79, 102, 103, 309, 324

nomos, 85

of Athena, 245–6

non-quantitative attributes, 175–92, 212–15

see also dynamis, pitch, quantification

notation

melodic

Alypian and non-Alypian, 61–6

determinacy of, 66–7

of melodies and structures, 62–3

and musical practice, 66

reveals magnitudes only, 61–5, 175, 176

and theories of the harmonikoi, 56, 60–7, 74, 77

see also scores

metrical, 62–3, 176

notes, 118, 120, 141

as having ‘breadth’, 80, 144

coinciding in pitch, 207–8, 210, 214–27

composed of parts, 371–2

defined 119, 145n

diatonic and enharmonic, names of, 404–6

and dynameis, 120, 185–92, 213–15

see also dynamis

as dynameis and as pitches, 185, 187

fixed, 13–14, 38, 128, 397, 398–9, 400

flattened, 95

as ‘high’ and ‘low’, 21, 144

higher as more conspicuous, 429

in identification of intervals and progressions, 177, 199, 206, 213–15, 222

identities of, 12, 128, 163–4

melodic roles of, 163–4, 177

see also dynamis

moveable, 13–14, 38, 118, 397, 401–3

earlier conception of, 404–5

positions of, 128, 129–30

ranges (‘spaces’) of, 128, 150, 158–9

their limits, 142–3

as movements, 141

names of, 12–13, 163, 187n, 187–8, 404–6

by dynamis and thesis, 188

omitted in certain styles, 246

as pitches, pitched sounds 185, 187, 416n

as points without extension 145n

and positions in the pyknon, 207–8, 210, 214–19, 227

ratios of, 27–9, 371–2

see also ratios

as ‘sharp’ and ‘heavy’, 21, 144

see also pitch

successive, 42, 80, 163, 177

see also continuity, succession

as ‘tense’ and ‘relaxed’, 21–2, 144

see also lichanos, mesē, parhypatē, pitch, pitch-relations

numbers

concordant, 306–7, 315, 316–17

‘in concords’, 25, 29, 315

and limit, 279–80

in ratios, and pitch, 322, 408

‘related under a single name’, 372, 375–8

as the subject of Plato’s harmonics, 315, 318, 322

and sizes of intervals, 29–30

symbolic meanings of, 274–5, 281–3

terms ‘in numbers’, ‘not in numbers’, 340–1

in Theophrastus see quantification

see also ratios

observation see perception

octachords, seven, 43–4, 52, 223

octave

added to concord 126, 127, 388n

basic structure of, 13, 265–6, 329, 331–2

division of, by means, 302, 331–2, 335–8

names of, 22, 264, 265, 268, 329, 332–3

not equally divisible, 305, 388–90

octave systems see systēmata

its ‘parts, magnitudes and excesses’, 334–7, 338

quantified by Philolaus, 264, 268, 277

size of, 359, 360, 383, 388–90

species of, see species

symmetry in see symmetry

see also interval

oikeios, oikeiotēs see appropriateness

opposites, harmonisation of, 345

organikoi (instrument-teachers), 439

paean

of Athenaeus, 15n, 100n, 398–9

of Limenius, 398–9

Panpipes, 26, 27, 28

paramesē 265

parhypatē, positions and ranges of, 129–30, 144–5, 158

perception (aisthēsis)

accuracy or inaccuracy of, 37, 169–70

of concords and discords, 93

as criterion of judgement, 438–40

and demonstration see demonstration

of differences in genus, 171–2

and hearing, in Aristoxenus, 169n, 174–5

and musical ‘meaning’, 174–5

of microtones, 91–3

of octave plus fourth, 387–8

of phenomena studied by harmonics, 141–3, 148, 149–50, 151–2, 153, 428

of pitch, 28

and principles, 111–12, 167–8, 358, 441–2

its role in Aristoxenian harmonics, 168–75, 439–40

and scientific knowledge, 107–8

simultaneous with dianoia, 173–4, 237–8

of simultaneous musical elements, 173n, 237–8

as ‘spark’ for reason, 439

training of, 40, 169–70, 171, 240

and understanding, 90, 91, 170–5

‘of the universal’, 112

see also hearing

perfect systems see systēmata

performances

contexts of, 82–3

ēthos of see ēthos

as musical ‘ends’, 241–2

phainomena, phenomena see appearances, perception

philosophy

and empirical harmonics, 96–7

and musical judgement, 258–9

and Nicomachus’ harmonics, 446–7

and Plato’s harmonic theories, 311–15

and Porphyry, 449

phōnaskikoi (voice-trainers), 439

physis see nature

pitch (tasis), pitches, 12, 118

abstract and concrete conceptions of, 147–8, 149

Aristoxenus’ discussion of, 146–8

attributes of, 29, 144

oxytēs and barytēs, 21, 144, 146–7, 148, 280, 429–30

continuum of, 21

and force or vigour, 28, 418–21

and frequency of impacts, 370–5, 408, 416–18

and key see tonoi

linear conception of, 24–5, 29

and motionlessness of voice, 143, 146, 147–8

and notes of the pyknon, 207–8, 210, 215–27

perception of, 28

physical and auditory conceptions of, 30, 146, 166–8, 390–1, 428

as points lacking extension, 144–5

as qualitative, 413, 430–1, 448–9

quantitative conceptions of, 27–9

criticised 412–28

and shape, 429–31

and speed, 28, 146, 305–6, 322, 373, 374, 381, 416–21

as ‘tension’, 21–2, 147

tension and relaxation of (epitasis and anesis), 144, 146–7

pitch (tasis), pitches (cont.)

as a topos (‘space’), 140–1

see also notes, pitch-relations

pitch-relations

as linear distances, 23–5, 29, 140–1

the theory criticised, 413

measurement of, see measurement

as ratios, 27–9, 371–5

the theory criticised, 412–21

representations of, 20–3, 144

see also intervals, pitch, ratios

poiētikē see composition

point-line-plane-solid 271n

principles

of Aristotelian demonstration, see demonstration

of harmonics, 9

of Archytas’ harmonics, 288–307

of Aristoxenian harmonics, 41, 101n, 104, 120, 121, 122, 123, 131–4, 149, 154–5, 167–8, 189, 193, 194, 198–9, 204, 228

see also law of fourths and fifths

governing concords, 288–91, 342–8

governing synthesis of intervals, 160–1

of mathematical harmonics, 167–8

of Theophrastus’ harmonics, 431, 435–6

progressions

geometrical, 320

melodic, 186, 189, 191–2, 197–228

from incomposite intervals, 206, 212–13

from notes in the pyknon, 206–7, 213–15, 222

of notes, rhythmic durations and letter-sounds, 236–9

proportion, 410

musical, 283–5

in the Timaeus, 285

see also means

psychology see character, ēthos, soul

pyknōma, 23, 24–5, 42, 425

pyknon, in tetrachords, 42, 129, 200–1, 211, 390

not equally divisible, 359–60, 388–90, 391–4

as an indissoluble unit, 202–3, 205–6

and notes in chromatic and enharmonic, 206, 217

notes differently positioned in, 207–8, 210, 214–19, 227

perceived character of, 178–9, 180, 190, 192, 196

progressions from, 186, 191–2, 206

from its notes, 206–7

relations with ditone and tone, 205–6, 208–10

sequences of, outlawed, 201–4, 205

as a systēma 119n

pyknos (‘dense’, ‘compressed’), 24–5, 178, 180

quantification

Aristoxenus’ attitude to, 158, 164, 171–2, 175–92, 198, 200, 210–12, 222

Theophrastus’ critique of, 412–28, 435–6

see also measurement

quantity and quality, terms for 414n

quarter-tone, 38

absent in earliest enharmonic, 99–100

as a melodic interval, 157, 158, 162

recognition of, 156–8

rejected by certain theorists, 65–6, 91–3, 157

successions of, 42–3, 162

see also diesis, genus (enharmonic), intervals (minimal)

ratios

absent from Hippocratic De victu, 281

Adrastus’ classification of 342n

in Aristides Quintilianus, 441

in Aristotle frag. 47 Rose, 334–8

in aulos-construction, 58–9

better and worse, and terms ‘in no ratio’, 339–48

commensurability of terms see commensurable

of concords, 25, 267, 268, 288–91, 302, 316, 338–48, 372, 375–8, 384–8

lacking mathematical distinctiveness, 346–8, 357–8, 387

and the tetraktys, 282

of doubled concords, 345–6

of double octave, 348

epimeric (‘number to number’, superpartient), 289n, 321, 342–8, 372, 393

epimoric (superparticular)

and Archytas’ divisions, 288–91, 295–6, 301n, 297–302

and concords, 288–91, 342–8, 372, 375–8, 384–8

construction through chains of, 300–1, 301n, 302–3

defined, 289n, 375

not equally divisible, 272

Archytas’ proof, 303–5, 341, 351, 356, 382

in Sectio canonis, 379–82, 389

and mathematical means, 302–3

and melodic intervals, 288–91

in Plato, 321

of small numbers, 298, 300–1

of frequencies of impacts, 374–5

and string-lengths, 408

in Gaudentius, 441

interpretation of, 26–9

larger and smaller, 29–30

of the leimma (diesis in Philolaus), 269, 272–5, 321

mathematical theorems on, 378–84

multiple, 289, 290, 291, 321, 342–8, 372, 375–8, 379–82, 384–8

defined, 289n, 375

of octave plus fifth, 348

of octave plus fourth, 290, 348, 377, 387–8

principles governing, 288–91, 342–8

basis of, 291–2, 344–5

consequent difficulties, 290, 348

roles of, in Philolaus, 266–7, 268, 269–71, 272–5, 285–6

of string-lengths, 26, 407–8

and frequencies of impacts, 408

see also kanōn

terms of, and pitch, 322, 408

of thicknesses, 84

in the Timaeus see soul (of the universe)

of the tone, 267, 268, 320

words designating, 266, 360n, 376

see also harmonics (mathematical), intervals, measurement, pitch-relations

reason

as criterion of judgement, 438–40

in Nicomachus, 446–7

and ‘rational principles’, 288–302, 441–2

its role in Aristoxenus’ harmonics, 439–40

see also harmonics (mathematical), mathematics

rhetoric, rhetoricians, 66, 89

rhombos (‘bull-roarer’), 28

rhythm, 236–9, 244, 245–6, 349

Plato on 250, 309, 310n

rhythmics, 6, 7, 86, 240

agenda of, 6–7

routes (hodoi), from a given note or interval see progressions

‘same domain’ rule

in Aristotle, 109–10, 168, 353–61

in Aristoxenus 110, 167–8, 258n

see also demonstration

scales see systēmata

schisma, 273, 274, 277–8

sciences, domains of, 110

scores, 15n, 39n, 86, 321, 398–400

see also notation

semitone

constructed through concords, 157, 219–22

in El. harm. Book III 211n

major see apotomē

minor see diesis, leimma

relations with tone, 205–6

sequences of, 205

undivided in earliest enharmonic, 99–100

sequences see succession

seven-note systems see systēmata

shape

and pitch, 429–31

and sound and hearing 429n

simikion, 81

singing

accuracy in, 412–13, 433

movements generated in, 430

power used in, 418–19

and soul see soul

see also melōidia, voice

sizes, see magnitudes

sophists, 68–78, 87–8, 327

soul

of the universe (‘World-Soul’), 319–26, 406, 432n, 444

and astronomy, 323

circles in, 322–3

its division, 319–23, 331

indeterminate features of, 322

its musical compass, 320, 321–2

and music, 320–2

its ratios, intervals, structure, 320–1

human

and melody-making movement, 411–13, 433–6

musical therapy for, 324–6, 433–5

in the Timaeus, 323–6, 434–5
colontruerunontrue

distortion of its structure 323–4;

its ratios and intervals, 323–4

see also character, ēthos

sound

apparent continuity of, 373–4

direction of travel, 430

distance of travel or perceptibility, 419–20, 429

and impacts see impacts

as movement, 27, 141, 146, 193, 305–6, 322, 370–5, 416–18, 419–21

verbal, 236–9

words designating, 426

see also acoustics, pitch

speaker-hole, 126

specialisation, development of, 327

species, arrangement, form (eidos, schēma)

of fifth, 194–5, 223

of fourth, 122, 123, 194–5, 197, 208, 223

of octave, 43–4, 54n, 83, 153, 194–5

see also harmoniai (Eratoclean)

and tonoi, 223–7

spondeion, spondeiazōn (spondeiakos) tropos, 100, 101n, 399–400

strings

lengths and ratios of, 26, 407–8

see also kanōn

oscillations of, 373–4, 407–8

tensions of, 425

weighted, 27

succession (to hex={e}s)

of intervals, notes and systēmata, 41–3, 118, 121, 122, 123, 130, 132n, 161–4, 177

of equal incomposite intervals, 205

of intervals of one third of a tone, 127–8

of unequal incomposite intervals, 205–6

see also continuity, synthesis, systēmata

superimposed structures, 210, 215–27

see also modulation, tonoi

‘sweetening’ of intervals, 128, 235, 297–8

syllogism

forms of, 106

non-syllogistic arguments, 201

symbainein, meanings of 193n

symboulē 255

symmetry, in the octave

in Aristotle frag. 47 Rose, 336–7

in Philolaus, 277–8, 280, 336

in [Plut.] De musica, 331

symphōnos

meanings of, 316

see also concords

synthesis

of intervals, 118, 131, 160–1

of musical elements 238n

and ēthos, 245–6

syrinx

as device on aulos, 126

as instrument see Panpipes

systēmata (scales, systems), 8–10, 42, 118, 120

and attunements 8n

bounded by concords, 119

continuity of see continuity

diversity of, 8

and demonstration, 152–3, 154–5

‘gapped’ 99–100, 275

as melodic syntheseis of intervals, 131, 150, 154

and melody, 7–8

modulating and simple, 177–8

see also modulation

and the nature of melos, 160

nine-note, 394–401

octave, 13, 15, 39, 43, 321, 331–2

forms or species of see species

pentatonic 100n

perfect, 12–18, 188–191

Greater, 13, 16, 83, 127n, 219

Lesser, 16

Unchanging, ‘immutable’ (ametabolon), 16, 54, 394–401

applications of the expression, 397, 400–1

as a primary topic of harmonics, 138, 150–2

relations between, 9

see also tonoi

seven-note, 15, 98, 275–7

successions of see succession

and tonoi, 223

see also tonoi

two-octave, 12–18, 321, 386–7, 394–404

varieties and attributes of, 151–3, 154

technical disciplines, and critical judgement, 236–43

see also judgement

telos, teleios, atelēs, in Aristoxenus, 230–3, 241–3

tetrachords 12–16, 38n

as basic to melodic structure, 54, 199n, 202–3, 329, 334–5

chromatic, 38, 200

diatonic, 38, 200

divisions of, 94, 171–2, 438

according to Archytas, 288, 292–302
runontruecolontrue

peculiarities of, listed, 293–4

discussed 295–300

according to Aristoxenus, 128–30, 155–9, 200, 292–3, 294, 296–8

see also genus

dynameis of, 175, 185–6, 191

enharmonic, 38, 200

identification of, in Aristoxenus, 191

irregular or defective, 50, 51

names of, 13, 14

not equally divisible, 304–5

omitted in certain styles, 246

pyknon in see pyknon

relations between, 12, 49–50, 131, 191, 198

relations between their intervals, 293–4, 295–9

as systēmata, 119

in the Timaeus, 321

tetraktys, 282–3, 347, 397, 398

theorems

in Aristoxenus, 122, 123, 131, 134, 197–228

arrangement of, 204–8

logical peculiarities of, 199–200, 203, 207–15

and mathematics, 197–8

in missing parts of El. harm., 227–8

negative, 201

non-quantitative interpretation of, 212–15

positive, 204

preliminary propositions, 197, 198–9

problematic features of, 199–200, 208–15

purposes of, 200

and quantification, 198, 200, 210–12

and tonoi, 215–28

two examples discussed, 201–4

underlying assumptions of, 203

in Sectio canonis, 378–94

harmonic, 359–60, 384–94
runontruecolontrue

and ‘bridging principles’ 385;

and division of the kanōn see kanōn;

logical flaw in 357–8, 386–7;

musical and mathematical premises of 384–5, 387–8;

on ratios of concords and tone 384–8;

on sizes and divisions of intervals, 388–94

mathematical, 356, 378–84
colontruerunontruenocommatrue

arithmetical or geometrical 378–9, 380–1, 383, 407;

and constructions 391–2;

on epimoric ratios 304n, 379–82;

on multiple ratios 379–82;

on numerically specified ratios, 383

origins of, 381–3

and prior knowledge, 383–4, 408–9

systematic arrangement of, 409

therapy, musical, 324–6, 433–5

thirds, major, 300

minor, 300

thought see dianoia

tone (interval)

constructed through concords 294n

defined, 93, 156

in disjunctions see disjunction

division of

in Aristoxenus, 119, 121, 127–8

not equally divisible, 272, 277, 304–5, 341, 359–60, 388–90, 391, 441

and quantification of, in Philolaus, 272–5, 277–8

in El. harm. Book III 211n

names for, 266–7

in Philolaus, 266–7, 272–5, 276–8, 281

progressions from, 206

ratio of see ratio

recognition of, 156

as reference-point for measurement, 156–9

relations with ditone and semitone, 205–6

relations with pyknon, 205, 208–9, 214

sequences of, 205, 222

tonoi (‘keys’), 12, 16n, 17, 54n, 65, 118, 120, 122, 124, 215–28

and Aristoxenus’ theorems, 217–28

Cleonides on, 217–22

Dorian, 99, 227

and modern (‘transposition’) keys, 55–6, 215–16, 224, 225–7

names of, 56, 218, 225, 226–7

and octave-species, 223–7

in Olympus’ nomos of Athena, 245–6

in Philoxenus’ Mysians, 244

as a primary topic of harmonics, 138

‘redundant’ 226–7

spacings, irregular, 56

by semitones, 216, 218, 219–22

by semitones and tones, 225

system of fifteen 442n

of seven, 224–7

of thirteen 216, 218, 219–22, 225–7, 442n

treatment by harmonikoi, 55–6, 87, 216

see also modulation

topos (‘space’)

of moveable notes see notes

of voice’s movement see voice

tragedy, 40, 70, 71, 89, 104, 393

tripous, 52n, 74–5, 77, 82–3

tritē (trita), in Philolaus, 264, 265–6, 275

tritone, in Mixolydian, 49–50

understanding (xynesis), 170–7, 181–3, 239

and ‘visible product’, contrasted, 182–3

see also ‘following’ music

unit see interval (minimal), measurement

use of musical elements

and evaluative attributes, 238, 244–5

values, in Plato’s philosophy, 313–15

see also evaluation, judgement

vessels, as instruments, 27

virtues see values

voice, human, 28

mechanism of 412n

its melodic accuracy, 412–13, 433

mathematical explanations of, 412–13

movement of, 150, 441

direction of, 144

melodic (including ‘voice’ of an instrument), 118, 140–50, 160–1, 188

as diastēmatikē (‘intervallic’), 143n, 143–5

imperceptible, 144, 145, 148

natural, 166

its temporal continuity 145n

as represented in perception, 141–3, 145

in speech, 141

as ‘continuous’, 143

non-rational, 412

as persisting subject of movement, 145–6, 148, 160

range of, 126, 321

regions of, 118

stationary, 143, 146, 147–8

topos (‘space’) in which it moves, 140–1, 148–9

weasel, 145

words, 236–9

and musical ēthos, 250

zither, 80


© Cambridge University Press
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 710

Cambridge University Press
9780521879514 - The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece - by Andrew Barker
Index


Index of proper names

http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/79514/index/9780521879514_index.htm.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 709

''Finally I would like to say that it seems that maybe Aristoxenus’ methods are linked to those earlier musical theorists that he called ‘harmonikoi’. Also Aristoxenus seems to have been influenced by his studies with Aristotle, as the methods of Aristoxenus seem linked to Aristotle’s work in metaphysics and philosophy of science. And Aristoxenus work definitely influenced many who followed him, although those more independent thinkers used just portions of Aristoxenus’ approach. For example the brilliant philosopher Ptolemy used a method that was an amalgam of Archytas, Aristoxenus and others. As can be seen in Andrew Barker’s book ‘Scientific Method in Ptolemy’s Harmonics’ (chapter 6) there is much criticism of Aristoxenus in Ptolemy’s ‘Harmonics’, yet at the same time Ptolemy is combining Aristoxenus’ methods with those of Archytas and others, although Ptolemy does not necessarily admit it. Also from today’s perspective there may appear to be smaller differences in what to the ancients were major points of contention.''

http://popularlunchtable.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/music-its-all-greek-to-me/
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 708

Hagel, Stefan.

Modulation in altgriechischer Musik.
Ph.D., Classical Philology, Wien, 1999. 155 p. illus., tbls., mus. exs., transcr., transl., append.
Research director: Georg Danek
DDM Code: 19scHagS; DA no.: RILM no.: UM no.:
Publication: Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2000. ISBN 3-631-36642-6.
Additional keywords: Aristoxenos, Aristoxenus, paian, paean, rhythm, scales, scale systems, harmonikoi, harmonicists, Mesomedes, Delphic paeans, Limenios, Plutarch, Bacchius
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 707

Barker, A., Greek Musical Writings. 2 volumes (Cambridge, 1984-1989).

— “Hoi Kaloumenoi Harmonikoi: The Predecessors of Aristoxenus”, Proceedings of the
Cambridge Philological Society 24 (1978), 1-21.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 706

Professor Trey Conner conner@stpt.usf.edu
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 705


Book I.4 "from what point of view"?

170-1, 182,5 compression, synesis and "digital" singing


who were the Harmonikoi? katapuknosis assemblage

Eratocles: failed to investigate simple intervals first

Lasus of Hermione: coined the term mousike

the school of Epigonus: a teacher and artist, had a 40-stringed zither named after him.

Simos

the "other Pythagoras": the tripod, 3 differently tuned kitharas on a revolving base.


"it is usual in geometrical constructions to use such a phrase as "let this be a straight line'; but one must not be content with such language of assumption in the case of intervals. The geometrician makes no use of his faculty of sense-perception" (page 189). ''
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 704

"In Book II, section 33 of The Elements of Harmony, Aristoxenus makes it clear that "musical cognition" or synesis is fundamental to musical practice. Just as a DJ coodinates two space-times in order to "beatmatch" disparate compositional units--manually accelerating and decelerating the sounds of one record through one (headphoned) ear while monitoring the the shared space created by the sounds already emitting from the loudspeaker or over the airwaves with the other--Aristoxenus' musician must hear and "judge the magnitudes of the intervals" while "contemplating the function of the notes" with the intellect. At the same time, unlike the "geometrician" who "makes no use of his faculty of sense-perception" the musician must cultivate a synesis that involves juggling "permanent" and "changeable" elements at once. "For the student of musical science," in other words, accuracy of sense-perception is a fundamental requirement.



Turning to mind-body relations in La Monte Young's Dream House installations, it is fruitful to consider Aristoxenus' synesis as a site of Althusserian interpellation, a site where artists and technicians alike are already exploring the rhetorical and semiotic connections between composer and performer. Classics scholar D. Levins keenly identifies Macran's diverse translations of synesis (as "musical cognition" and "sensuous cognition" etc). This insight informs this analysis of the musical minimalism, born out of the Fluxus movement, that took up and interpreted some of Cage's ideas about fundamental compositional units (which were first formalized by Aristoxenus) in their own particular way. Aristoxenus says that... ''
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 703

''Now, if we go along with Socrates, all of this attention to small intervals may sound "ridiculous," and the harmonikoi could be said to take quite a beating in this Socratic definition of movement; however, as Socrates carries on, the accretive resonance of humor propels his analogy-sequencing brings to an object worthy of our attention, even and especially today. Socrates piles on, conjuring the image of harmonikoi, seriouslooking clowns hard at work, but to no good end. The harmonikoi, Socrates continues,



are always obsessing over meaningless distinctions, some of them asserting that they can still just hear a sound in between, and that that is the smallest interval, by which measurement is to be made, while others take issue with them, saying the notes sounded are already the same, each group putting their ears ahead of their mind. (p. 56)



These small intervals are no small matter for Plato, nor should they be. Because although it seems to be a desire for order that compelled the Pythagoreans and the scrupulous katapuknosis practice of the harmonikoi, there science opens up the possibility for effacious selection and recombination of nonsemantic units, for ends persuasive and otherwise. ''
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 702

"Aristoxenus and Plato both criticized the harmonikoi, the wandering musical Sophists of antiquity, for their fixation on their diagrams, and their reputedly inept demonstrations utilizing technologies of compression. Their "pyknon machines" were, in a sense, musical instruments. Katapuknosis, defined as the “close packing of the intervals of a scale” in Henry Liddel and Robert Scott's A Greek-English Lexicon, available online at Tufts University's Perseus Project, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/. Andrew Barker (1978) tells how wandering musical theorists, known as harmonikoi, designed diagrams “to facilitate comparisons between scalar structures by displaying them all within the same theoretical pitch,” and named this procedure katapuknosis ( p. 11).



At the same time, across Plato's dialogues, composed in 4th century B.C. Greece, Socrates finds numerous occasions to talk about musical aesthetics, music's affective powers, and strictures regarding music's proper use in education. In the Timmaeus, Plato commingles perception of sound, harmonic theory, and cosmology. It is hard to argue with Barker (1989) who notes that "Plato's accounts of the sciences of astronomy and harmonics are strikingly idiosyncratic" theories concerned with and connected up with "an ideal mathematics of motion" (Greek Musical Writings Volume II Harmonic and Acoustic Theory, p. 53). Musicians and astronomers shared practices of compression, particularly in their affinity for diagrams. "The visible movements of the stars and the audible movements that constitute sounds are to be treated merely as 'diagrams' or perceptual aids,from which the mind can be led to grasp on the intelligible mathematical principles that perceptible movements may imperfectly exhibit" (p. 53). In The Republic 2.I 530c-d, we can see how the magnification and manipulation of small intervals relates to compression, but in this case, the practices of the technologically-focused harmonikoi receive the same harsh treatment as the poets.





A similar approach to movement and directed attention to the utility of "compression" appears in La Monte Young's musical practice, as well. While a noiseician like Masami Akita sets up his laboratory at the edges of chaos, Young, as a minimalist composer, deigns to direct attention to the smallest units and almost "static motion" at the horizon of perception. Whereas Lasus of Hermione (the same Lasus sometimes credited with the first elaboration of the term mousike) posited musical notes as occupying space on line or "scale," Young endeavors to extend the duration of his protos chronoi , sine waves, ad infinitum. Particular arrangements of small intervals take focus because, according to Young, these smaller intervals can be arranged— composed—in such a way that these small, or compressed, intervals resonate higher orders of harmonics. On the one hand, Young and Plato share an affinity for mathematical theories of harmonics. On the other hand, Plato's treatment of the pyknomata in the Republic suggests that Young's entire oeuvre, a singularly focused exercise in treating the smallest intervals, or microtones, as units that can be arranged to measure and manipulate space, is in vain, or at the very least, useless. Here (pardon the "string" metaphor), a metaphysical tension between intensive and infinite space presents an opportunity to consider Young's work as a musical form of machine language.



The harmonikoi diagrams (insert image here) look a lot like diagrams illustrating the travelling salesman problem...



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet



Aristoxenus' fragment on rhythm does not say much about the pyknomata of the harmonikoi, rather, he details the the practice of writing “compression algorithms” with pynknomata in the Elementa Harmonica, where he seeks to isolate a precise Aristotelian defintion of musical cognition. But the Elementa Rhythmica does propose the term protos chronos to describe "primary time-lengths" that "cannot be further subdivided by any rhythmizomenon" (Pearson trans., 1990, p. 10). Elsewhere, the protos chronos is "the time-length which is too short to contain even two notes or two syallables or two signals."



This marks a limit that those of who work with computers know all too well, a limit defined by a feeling, and "embodied" intuitive cognition that science and technology continue to treat as a "secret" to unlock. For Aristoxenus, this threshold helped to define the domain proper to music, as distinct from mathematics and other domains.



When J.J. Gibson talks about sound, he seems to describe the ultimate information compression algorithm (for embodied (trans)human consciousness?): sound is the most simplified formal result of the process that Collier and Burch (1998) call rhythmic entrainment. "The result of rhythmic entrainment is a simplification of the entrained system, in the sense that the information required to describe it is reduced" (p. 1).



The pursuit of the pronos chronos, or fundamental unit: (make link to Roy Ascott's article, here--> down a rabbit hole?



revisit pedagogy with example: chat, leet, and wiki recursion



Instant messaging is a powerful tool for quick communication and connection, and using IM, people grow diverse and context-sensitive forms of shorthand, or "information compression." It can also provide rehearsal in/on/around a particular idiom.

It seems fair to say that rhythm is not so much a previously determined goal or pre-set metrical count as something that must emerge in time. A lot of us have pointed out the different rhythms that can emerge when we volley text in chat clients. At passionate users (link),

computer programmer and programming instructor Kathy Sierra and software developer Dan Russell

argue the same.

Considering the effects: most of us do not stare at a blank screen when trying to write an IM, while many of us do exactly that while trying to write a "paper". Letting themes emerge, and then tuning them towards the particular idiom or audience, can we use IM and wiki to write "papers?" How does a "paper" audience differ from an "IM" audience, even when they are the same person(s)?



as antidote to wiki-infinity. Consider Rotman's two strategies for attending to obstacle/attractor of classical integers in mathematics:



"The first makes questions of significance and meaning subsidiary by starting from a symbolic apparatus based on formal definitions and concepts able to be worked to produce mathematical results. The second reverses the procedure and insists on an intuition first, a convincing alternative picture of what counting and iteration are to mean before any particular formalism is offered" (Rotman page 1688).''

http://distributedlearningproject.pbwiki.com/katapuknosis+assemblage.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 701

Plato ridicules these harmonikoi listening
intently over their monochords in Republic 531a-c.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 700


* Aristoxenus and Empiricism: A Reevaluation Based on His Theories
* Malcolm Litchfield
* Journal of Music Theory, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Spring, 1988), pp. 51-73 (article consists of 23 pages)
* Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of the Yale University Department of Music


79. Aristoxenus Har. 1.2-3; 2.40-41 (Macran, pp. 165-66; 194-96); Andrew Barker, "Hoi kaloumenoi harmonikoi: The Predecessors of Aristoexnus," Proceedings ...
links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2909(198821)32%3A1%3C51%3AAAEARB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 699

...the harmonikoi are the subject of numerous complaints...
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.31 0 0 698

LSJ

Harmon-ikos , ê, on,

A. skilled in music, Pl.Phdr. 268d; ha. ou mageiros musician, Damox.2.49 codd.

II. musical: ta -ka theory of music, Pl.Phdr.268e , Arist.Metaph.1077a5; hê en tois mathêmasin -kê (sc. epistêmê) mathematical theory of music, ib.997b21; ha. pragmateia a treatise thereon, Plu.2.1142f; harmonika stoicheia, title of work by Aristoxenus; harmonikoi, hoi, students of -kê, hoi kata tous arithmous ha. Arist.Top.107a16 ; with play on (b), Aristox. Harm.p.I M.

b. of or in the enharmonic scale, nomos Plu.2.1133e .

c. ha. kinêsis, of the pulse, in harmony with physical state, Gal.19.376.

III. Arith., harmonic, mesa Archyt.2 ; ha. analogia Ph.1.27 , Nicom.Ar.2.22, Theo Sm.p.114H.; mesotês Arist.Fr.47 ; logoi Ph.1.22 (Sup.); logoi kat' arithmôs ha. sunkekramenoi Ti.Locr. 96a , cf. Arist.de An.406b29.

IV. ha. gumnasion training by rule of thumb, Philostr.Gym.53.

V. metaph., capable of harmonizing, taktikoi kai ha. Plu.2.618c ; of God, ib.946f.

VI. Adv. -kôs ib.1138e, Iamb.Comm.Math.32.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3D%2315285
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 697

The Modes Of Ancient Greek Music (Hardcover)
by David Monro

* Hardcover: 160 pages
* Publisher: Kessinger Publishing, LLC (December 1, 2004)

Key Phrases - SIPs: disjunctive tone, dorian species, standard octave, octave scale, diatonic scale
Key Phrases - CAPs: Aristotelian Problems, Heraclides Ponticus, Aristides Quintilianus, Enharmonic Phrygian, Lydian Mese (more)
Browse Sample Pages: Front Cover | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:


Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence:
THE modes of ancient Greek music are of interest to us, not only as the forms under which the Fine Art of Music was developed by a people of extraordinary artistic capability, but also on account of the peculiar ethical influence ascribed to them by the greatest ancient philosophers. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
disjunctive tone, dorian species, standard octave, octave scale, diatonic scale
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Aristotelian Problems, Heraclides Ponticus, Aristides Quintilianus, Enharmonic Phrygian, Lydian Mese, Orestes of Euripides, Pronomus of Thebes
New!

http://www.amazon.com/Modes-Ancient-Greek-Music/dp/1432602551#sipbody
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 696

H
C. Spyridis and J. P. Prinos,
"Computer-Aided Determination
of the Genus
and Tropos of an Extract from the Ancient Greek Music,"
Acustica
[ISSN
0001-7884] 77,1 (1992) 1-11. "This contribution
represents the first
time that
[determining the genus and tonos]
has been carried out very
quickly
with the aid of a computer and a proper algorithm.
The algo-
rithm is based on the one hand on the tonality,
...and on the other hand
on the definite
functionality,
which every step had in each genus of
each tonos.
An application
[to the second grammatical sentence of the
second Delphic Hymn] of the whole process is given."
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 695


david.whitwell@csun.edu
Office: MU231
Phone: (818) 677-3176


DAVID WHITWELL
Music History

David Whitwell received his education at The University of Michigan (with Distinction) and The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. (Ph.D., Musicology; Distinquished Alumni Award, 2000), with post-doctoral work at the Akademie fur Musik, Vienna, and the University of Vienna.

Prior to coming to Northridge in 1969, Dr. Whitwell participated in hundreds of concerts throughout the United States and Asia as Associate First Horn in the USAF Band and Orchestra in Washington, D.C., and in recitals throughout South America in cooperation with the United States State Department. After teaching at Temple University and having served as Director of Bands at the University of Montana, he joined the CSUN faculty, where he developed the CSUN Wind Ensemble into an ensemble of international reputation, with international tours to Europe in 1981 and 1989 and to Japan in 1984. The recordings of the CSUN Wind Ensemble have been broadcast on major radio and television stations throughout the world. Dr. Whitwell has been a guest professor in more than eighty different universities and conservatories throughout the world and has conducted resident ensembles in Austria, Switzerland, Israel, Japan, Wales, England, Germany, The Netherlands, Bolivia, Peru, Korea, Russia and the United States, among them the Philadelphia Orchestra, Seattle Symphony Orchestra, the Czech Radio Orchestras of Brno and Bratislava, and The National Youth Orchestra of Israel.

His numerous honors include medals presented by professional societies in Germany, The Netherlands, France, Scotland, Portugal and most recently the Gold Medal of the Austrian Band Association. His publications include one hundred nineteen articles on wind literature, including publications in Music and Letters (London), The London Musical Times, the Mozart-Jahrbuch (Salzburg), and thirty-eight books, including a twelve-volume, History and Literature of the Wind Band and Wind Ensemble and an eight volume series on Aesthetics in Music, in addition to more than three hundred fifty editions of early wind band music.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 694
http://www.whitwellessays.com/docs/DOC_481.doc.

Essays on the Origins of Western Music

by

David Whitwell


Essay Nr. 71: On the Ancient Greek Modes








As we have mentioned in the previous essay, the only fragments of ancient Greek music which have survived are from the last period, the “Roman Period.” There is no extant music from the great centuries of ancient Greece, the 8th through the 4th century BC. Similarly, there is no notation of, or discussion of the theory of the modes, before Aristoxenus, a pupil of Aristotle.

On the other hand, the most frequently discussed aspect of ancient Greek music by ancient philosophers was these modes. Unlike the later Church modes of Western Europe which share the same names, such as “Dorian,” and are characterized by, and taught as, varying accumulations of half- and whole step intervals together with cadential centers, the ancient Greek mode names were names of societies of people. A label such as “Dorian” was used to reflect the style of a specific society of people’s music much as today we might speak of “German” or “French” music. Eventually they became systems for tuning the lyre, at a time when the Greeks had no names for the actual notes of music. Later, Aristoxenus coined the term tonos, suggesting that perhaps they had become somewhat more like modern scales. But none of this tells us anything about the music itself.1

As we have said, the character of the music seemed to be widely understood as reflecting the character of the people. What did they mean by that? Athenaeus begins by agreeing with an argument, in a now lost book by Heracleides of Pontus, that really one should only speak of three Greek modes, the Dorian, Aeolian, and Ionian, as these represent the three main tribes of the Greeks. Phrygian and Lydian, he says originated with the “barbarians” [meaning those who do not speak Greek well] and were learned by the Greeks from them. He then attempts to portray the character of these three tribes, with the obvious suggestion that the music of these modes somehow is of the same character.

Now the Dorian mode exhibits the quality of manly vigor, of magnificent bearing, not relaxed or merry, but sober and intense, neither varied nor complicated. But the Aeolian character contains the elements of ostentation and turgidity, and even conceit; these qualities are in keeping with their horse-breeding and their way of meeting strangers; yet this does not mean malice, but is, rather, lofty and confident. Hence also their fondness for drinking is something appropriate to them, also their love affairs, and the entirely relaxed nature of their daily life.

Next in order let us examine the Milesians’ character, which the Ionians illustrate. Because of their excellent physical condition they bear themselves haughtily, they are full of irate spirit, hard to placate, fond of contention, never condescending to kindliness nor cheerfulness, displaying a lack of affection and a hardness in their character. Hence also the kind of music known as the Ionian mode is neither bright nor cheerful, but austere and hard, having a seriousness which is not ignoble; and so their mode is well-adapted to tragedy. But the character of the Ionians today is more voluptuous, and the character of their mode is much altered.2

The belief in these kinds of associations continued for centuries. Heinrich Glarean, for example, in his Dodecachordon of 1547, writes in a similar vein.

If I am allowed to make a rough judgment concerning this and the preceding modes, I shall say it in a few words: Each mode seems to me to reflect beautifully the customs of the people from which the names are taken. The Athenians were truly Ionians, the Spartans were Dorians; the former, although lovers of pleasant things and students of eloquence, were still always considered capricious. Yet the Spartans, renowned in war and bound by military discipline and the severe laws of Lycurgus, have preserved longer the harsh customs handed down from their ancestors. These modes have the same characteristics. The Ionian, devoted entirely to dancing, contains much sweetness and pleasantness, almost no severity. On the contrary, the Dorian presents a certain majesty and dignity which it is easier to admire than to explain. It is very suitable for [epic] poetry, as I have myself experienced at one time as a youth in Koln in the presence of the celebrated Kaiser Maximilian and many princes, not without the reward of the merited laurel branch (which is said without boasting).3

The great Baroque writer, Johann Mattheson, in his review of tonality4 still refers to the association of the Greek modes with the peoples for whom they were named.

It is probably that the Dorians had a coarser, more manly, and deeper speaking voice than the Phrygians; and that on the other hand the Lydians sang finer and more effeminately than the others. For the Dorians were a modest, virtuous and peaceful people; the Phrygians however used more noise than foresight; whereas the Lydians, forefathers of the Tuscans, were everywhere described as sensual people.

Henry Agrippa, in his three volume De occulta philosophia, written in 1509 - 1510, written in the old mold of Catholic Scholasticism, claims to have found ancient sources which tie the above associations with the ancient philosophers theories on basic elements. He then adds to the mix the Renaissance ideas of the “Humors” and the “music of the spheres.”

Moreover, they that followed the number of the elements, did affirm, that the four kinds of music do agree to them, and also to the four humors, and did think the Dorian music to be consonant to the Water and phlegm, the Phrygian to choler and Fire, the Lydian to blood and Air, the mixed-Lydian to melancholy and Earth: others respecting the number and virtue of the heavens, have attributed the Dorian to the Sun, the Phrygian to Mars, the Lydian to Jupiter, the mixed-Lydian to Saturn, the hypo-Phrygian to Mercury, the hypo-Lydian to Venus, the hypo-Dorian to the Moon, the hypo-mixed-Lydian to the fixed star….5

In any event, the ancients believed in the relationship between music and character much more than anyone today. Even Aristotle, who wrote with little enthusiasm about music in general, took this relationship seriously.

We accept the division of melodies...into ethical melodies, melodies of action, and passionate or inspiring melodies, each having, as they say, a mode corresponding to it....

In education the most ethical modes are to be preferred, but in listening to the performances of others we may admit the modes of action and passions also. For feelings such as pity and fear, or, again, enthusiasm, exist very strongly in some souls, and have more or less influence over all. Some persons fall into a religious frenzy, whom we see as a result of the sacred melodies -- when they have used the melodies that excite the soul to mystic frenzy -- restored as through they had found healing and purgation. Those who are influenced by pity and fear, and every emotional nature, must have a like experience, and others in so far as each is susceptible to such emotions, and all are in a manner purged and their souls lightened and delighted. The purgative melodies likewise give an innocent pleasure to mankind.6

Let us, then, look at a representative sampling of these relationships as held by earlier philosophers.


DORIAN

Music of a moderate and settled temper…grave and manly.7

…..

All men agree that Dorian music is the gravest and manliest.8

Aristotle (384 – 322 BC)

Majestic.

Aristoxenus (born c. 179 BC)

Exhibits the quality of manly vigor, of magnificent bearing, not relaxed or merry, but sober and instense, neither varied nor complicated.9

Athenaeus (c. 200 AD)



Warlike.10

Apuleius (123 – 180 AD)

Bestows wisdom to and causes chastity in the listener.11

Ornithoparchus (1517)


PHRYGIAN

Exciting and orgiastic and inspires enthusiasm.

Aristotle

Causes wars and inflames fury.

Ornithoparchus

More suitable to severe, religious music, as elegies, laments and funeral music.12

Glarean (1547)

Here never does one sing in Phrygian modes,

Since nowhere is there argument and din….13

Antonio Abbatini (1667)

The Phrygian mode lies at the center of one of the most frequently told tales regarding the character of these modes, an incident involving Alexander the Great. As Plutarch retells this moment,

Even Alexander himself, when Antigenides played before him in the [Phrygian] mode, was so transported and warmed for battle by the charms of lofty melodies, that leaping from his seat all in his clattering armor he began to lay about him and attack those who stood next him, thereby verifying to the Spartans what was commonly sung among themselves,

The masculine touches of the well-tuned lyre

Unsheathe the sword and warlike rage inspire.14



LYDIAN

Relaxed.15

Plato (427 – 347)

Sharpens the wit of the dull and moves the mind from earthly to heavenly desires.

Ornithopaarchus

Harsh.

Glarean


AEOLIAN

The Aeolian character contains the elements of ostentation and turgidity, and even conceit; these qualities are in keeping with their horse-breeding and their way of meeting strangers; yet this does not mean malice, but is, rather, lofty and confident. Hence also their fondness for drinking is something appropriate to them, also their love affairs, and the entirely relaxed nature of their daily life.

Athenaeus

Calms the tempest of the mind and, after having done so, lulls it to sleep.

Ornithoparchus



IONIAN

Relaxed.

Plato

Associated with dancing. Because some men attribute a frivolous wantonness to this mode, it was rarely used in older Church music.

Glarean



HYPODORIAN

Magnificent and steadfast.

Aristotle

The lowest of all….These tones...have been shown to possess such great usefulness that they calm excited minds and cause even wild animals and serpents and birds and dolphins to approach and listen to their harmony.

Cassiodorus (480 – 573 AD)

Hypolydian [is good] for lamentations because of its doleful sound.16

John, On Music [c. 1100 AD]





HYPOPHRYGIAN

Has the character of action.17

Aristotle

HYPOIONIAN

Great charm in morning songs and love songs, especially in the Celtic tongue which the Swiss use....

Glarean

MIXOLYDIAN

Mixolydian makes men sad and grave…woeful and quiet.

Aristotle

Pathetic.

Aristoxenus

The ancients heard Mixolydian as melancholic.18

Plutarch (46 – 127 AD)

A certain tranquil dignity which both moves and dominates the people.

Glarean

Aside from these early descriptions of the character of the Greek modes, there are a few additional observations which seem to carry important information but lack sufficient detail to be helpful to the modern reader. First, a comment by Aristoxenus (born c. 379 BC), who wrote at a time when theorists were attempting to formulate a written form of the modes. But his comment makes it clear that the written form did not address the essence of the modes.

[Just because] a man notes down the Phrygian scale it does not follow that he must know the essence of the Phrygian scale. Plainly then notation is not the ultimate limit of our science.19

This reminds us of a problem in our modern Church-mathematical notational system. We lack completely symbols for feeling, even though that is the whole point of music. We can imagine one saying, “We can write music, but the notation does not reveal the essence of the music.”

This distinction seems to be intended by Aristoxenux again when he refers to a song “which is sung to the Hypodorian scale,” but is described as “being in the Aeolian mode.”

Second, although it is understood that the names of the Greek modes were originally intended to represent the music of specific peoples, and not music theory, one must imagine that the styles within “Dorian,” for example, were rather broad and that it was not just one style. Something of this nature seems suggested by a comment of Plutarch,

Indeed it is much questioned among the Dorians themselves, whether the enharmonic composers be competent judges of the Dorian songs.20

It must have been a similar sophistication within the genre which caused additional adjectives such as Aristophanes’ expression, a “soft Ionian Love song,”21 not to mention Aeschylus’,

Through me too sorrow runs

Like a strange Ionian Song....22

What can “a strange Ionian Song” mean? This adjective also occurs twice in Euripides,

O Muse, be near me now, and make

A strange song for Ilion’s sake....23

…..

A lad alone on Ida,

Playing tunes on his pipe, strange melodies,

Like the melodies Olympus sang....24

Aristoxenus mentioned another of these stylistic distinctions when he quoted a passage from Aristotle’s Problems,

…which justifies the use of the Hypodorian and Hypophrygian modes for the lyrics sung by actors, when realistic action was called for, but not for those of the chorus....25

A final example of information within the genre now lost to us is found in a play by Aristophanes and is a representative of ancient Greek humor.

You also know what a pig’s education he has had; his school-fellows can recall that he only liked the Dorian style and would study no other; his music master in displeasure sent him away saying; “This youth, in matters of harmony, will only learn the Dorian style because it is akin to bribery.”26

Today we have no idea why this was funny to the ancient Greeks, but it apparently involved a play on words, the spirit of which one French translator attempted to capture by referring to it as the “Louis d’or-ian mode.”

There are also some interesting contemporary comments which fall into the realm of performance practice. First, Plutarch mentions a composer named, Sacadas,

who composed a choral ode with the first strophe in Dorian, the second in Phrygian, and the third “after the Lydian manner; and this style was called Trimeres (or threefold) by reason of the shifting of the modes.”27

To the modern reader this would appear to be something on the order of modulation and it may have some relevance to a song by Alkman,

Sing, O Muse, sing high and clear

O polytonal many-voiced Muse,

Make a new song for girls to sing.

About the towered temple of Therapne.

Alkman (c. 640 - 600 BC), one of the ancient Greek lyric poets, was a slave and choral conductor. He was admired by Goethe and Aristotle said he suffered terribly from lice. Chamaeleon says Alkman “led the way as a composer of erotic songs, and was the first to publish a licentious song, being prone in his habits of life to the pursuit of women and to poetry of that kind.”28

Second, there is a comment by Aristotle (Politica 1342b) which is very interesting from several viewpoints. One can only wish that Aristotle had gone into his usual detail when he mentioned an instance of a performer who attempted to perform a dithyramb, “acknowledged to be Phrygian,” in the Dorian and could not do it.

Finally, there are three interesting comments from much later during the Christian Era, when the Church modes, with the same names, had replaced the ancient Greek modes. Today the Church modes are generally taught as scales with differing placements of half- and whole steps. No theory teacher today uses the kinds of descriptions used by the ancient Greeks, “noble,” “majestic,” etc., much less do the recommend to their students that these modes have differing effects on the listener. But these late medieval and renaissance theorists had some reason for continuing to think of the new Church modes as representing character in the style of the old Greek modes. It is a topic very worthy of reconsideration by today’s theorists.

Andreas Ornithoparchus, in his Musice active micrologus of 1517 warns that the musician must diligently observe which mode he plays for specific listeners! The men of our time, he says, know how to do this according to the nature of the occasion.

But our men of a more refined time do use sometimes the Dorian, sometimes the Phrygian, sometimes the Lydian and sometimes other modes, because they judge that according to differing occasions they are to choose differing modes. And that is not without cause, for every habit of the mind is governed by songs. For songs make men sleepy and wakeful, careful and merry, angry and merciful. Songs heal diseases and produce diverse wonderful effects, moving some to vain mirth, some to a devout and holy joy, yes often to godly tears.29

Heinrich Glarean in his Dodecachordon of 1547, a work devoted to the new Church modes, makes a similar comment which goes beyond mere half- and whole descriptions.

On the other hand, I believe that for the last four hundred years [the Ionian mode] has also been so deeply admired by church singers, that, enticed by its sweetness and alluring charm, they have changed many songs of the Lydian mode into this mode....30

In another place Glarean discusses this process at more length.

Modes are also changed from one into another but not with equal success. For in some cases the change is scarcely clear even to a perceptive ear, indeed, often with great pleasure to the listener, a fact which we have frequently declared is very common today in changing from the Lydian to the Ionian. Those who play instruments and who know how to sing readily the verses of poets according to a musical play, understand this. Indeed, in this way they are frequently worthy of praise if they do it skillfully, especially if they change the Ionian into Dorian. But in other cases the changing seems rough, and scarcely ever without a grave offense to the ears, as changing from the Dorian to the Phrygian. And so whenever present day organists encounter this difficulty in changing church songs in such a way, if they are not well trained and quick, they often incur the derision of experienced listeners.31

The third example comes from the Harmonie universelle (1636) by Marin Mersenne (1588 - 1648). Unfortunately, Mersenne does not give us the basis for the recommendations, but it is clear that he was thinking along the lines of the old Greek character associations when he endorsed, Giovanni Doni’s32 suggestions of a correspondence between the modes and the color of specific organ pipes.

The organ can be used to express each mode because of the great number of its stops, of which the one of tin is proper for the Dorian, and the others composed of pipes more or less large at the top than at the bottom, closed and open, for example, the narrow ones are suitable for the Phrygian, and the wider ones for the Lydian; and then he says that the pipes which imitate the block flutes are good to express the Dorian; those which imitate the fife and the flageolet for the Phrygian; and the cornett and the pipes which make the German flute for the Lydian. The boxwood is proper to make the Dorian pipes; the regals are good for the Lydian, and the brass pipes for the Phrygian.33

Another subject which the ancient philosophers took quite seriously was the choice of modes to be used in education. Their interest in the relationship between music and character development followed naturally their assumptions about the varying characters of the modes. The most extended discussion of this topic is found in Plato, who begins with a discussion of the music teacher.

The teachers of the lyre take similar care that their young disciple is temperate and gets into no mischief; and when they have taught him the use of the lyre, they introduce him to the poems of other excellent poets, who are the lyric poets; and these they set to music, and make their harmonies and rhythms quite familiar to the children’s souls, in order that they may learn to be more gentle, and harmonious, and rhythmical, and so more fitted for speech and action; for the life of man in every part has need of harmony and rhythm. Then they send them to the master of gymnastic....34

What kind of music is Plato describing here? First, the musical style must be simple and in a single style. More complex “mixed styles” Plato did not permit in education, although he admits this type of music was more popular with both children and the general public.

You would agree with me in saying that one [style] is simple and has but slight changes; and that if an author expresses this style in fitting harmony and rhythm, he will find himself, if he does his work well, keeping pretty much within the limits of a single harmony (for the changes are not great), and in like manner he will make a similar choice of rhythm?

That is quite true, he said.

Whereas the other requires all sorts of harmonies and all sorts of rhythms if the music and the style are to correspond, because the style has all sorts of changes.

That is also perfectly true, he replied.

And do not the two styles, or the mixture of the two, comprehend all poetry and every form of expression in words? No one can say anything except in one or other of them or in both together.

They include all, he said.

And shall we receive into our State all the three styles, the one only of the two unmixed styles? Or would you include the mixed?

I should prefer only to admit the pure imitator of virtue.

Yes, I said, Adeimantus; and yet the mixed style is also charming: and indeed the opposite style to that chosen by you is by far the most popular with children and their attendants, and with the masses.

I do not deny it.35

In the most frequently quoted passage regarding Plato’s views on music, we are told the choice of modes is to be strictly limited.

The harmonies which you mean are the mixed or tenor Lydian, and the full-toned or bass Lydian, and such-like.

These then, I said, must be banished; even to women who have a character to maintain they are of no use, and much less to men.

Certainly.

In the next place, drunkenness and softness and indolence are utterly unbecoming the character of our guardians.

Utterly unbecoming.

And which are the soft and convivial harmonies?

The Ionian, he replied, and some of the Lydian which are termed “relaxed.”

Well, and are these of any use for warlike men?

Quite the reverse, he replied; and if so the Dorian and the Phrygian are the only ones which you have left....

If these and only these are to be used in our songs and melodies, we shall not want multiplicity of strings or a panharmonic scale?

I suppose not.36

Aristotle’s discussion of this subject is not so extended, but it is clear his views followed those of Plato.

Even in mere melodies there is an imitation of character, for the musical modes differ essentially from one another, and those who hear them are differently affected by each. Some of them make men sad and grave, like the so-called Mixolydian, others enfeeble the mind, like the relaxed modes, another, again, produces a moderate and settled temper, which appears to be the peculiar effect of the Dorian; the Phrygian inspires enthusiasm. The whole subject has been well treated by philosophical writers on this branch of education, and they confirm their arguments by facts.37

Returning to the subject of education, and particularly the aspect of character building, Aristotle limits the appropriate modes.

But for education the ethical modes should be used, such as Dorian…. All men agree that the Dorian music is the gravest and manliest. And whereas we say that the extremes should be avoided and the mean followed, and whereas the Dorian is a mean between the other modes, it is evident that our youth should be taught in the Dorian music.38

One of the modern collections of the poetry of the Alexandrian Period of ancient Greece is called, Last Flowers.39 It is an appropriate title, for among the Greeks, these poets are the last link with the style of the old lyric poets who sang their poetry to the accompaniment of lyre or aulos. One of beautiful poems of this period, “Elegy on the Death of Bion,” (fl. 105 BC) proclaims that Dorian music itself has died. We do not know the poet who wrote this, although he says he was a student of Bion.

Ravines and Dorian waters, sigh with me;

And rivers, mourn for Bion....He is dead;

The lovely singer lies within the tomb....

No more the pastoral song may Bion sing;

With him, alas, has died the lyric strain;

And all the Dorian music has been slain....

He who the herds once charmed will sing no more,

Sitting in solitude the oaks among

To make his music. Now he sings before

Pluto; forgetfulness is all his song....

Bion, your fate Apollo’s self bemoans;

Full many a Satyr and Priapus weeps

In sable raiment. Pans with sobs and groans

Bewail your music. From the watery deeps

Full many a nymph her tearful visage rears;

The woodland springs are fountains of their tears....

Who now will play your pipes, O thrice bewailed?

Who on the reedy vents his mouth would place?

Thus overbold, he little had availed,

Where still your lips and breath have living grace,

Where Echo on the reeds your song maintains.

To Pan I bring your pipes; with little zest

For him, who fears to emulate your strains

Lest he himself should come off second best,

Lest far beyond him would your music go....

Dear master, long before I learned from you

The Dorian mode; to others may belong

Your wealth; but your sweet music is my due;

To me the larger heritage will go....40

We cannot know if the old Dorian music was indeed dead, but it is clear they all changed dramatically over time. Glarean seems to weaken any argument that the modes any longer have specific identifiable characters, by suggesting they can be changed in character by the composer.

Yet, it cannot be denied that antiquity has changed these modes, but undoubtedly the nature of modes can be turned in another direction, so that a mode which seems light in character can be used with not much difficulty for serious subjects (provided that a propitious talent is at hand), and on the contrary, a serious mode can be used for light subjects.41

During the late Middle Ages the old Greek treatises were being discovered and translated and this resulted in what we call Humanism in music, a return to making music express feeling and not mathematics. The passion of the Baroque composers to try and discover how emotions are communicated in music led, among other things, to rethinking the old Greek idea of associating character and tonality.

We will let Johann Mattheson represent this movement. He was one of the first who understood correctly that the emotions are related to melody, not harmony and points out,

…the nature and character of each key, namely whether it is happy, sad, lovely, devout, etc., are actually matters of the science of melody.42

In his Neu-Eroffnete Orchestre, Mattheson discusses this in more detail, contending that in the key of F-sharp minor, for example, he finds,

…a key characterized by sadness, but a sadness more pensive and lovelorn than tragic and gloomy; it is a key that has about it a certain loneliness, an individuality, a misanthropy.43

1 Neither does the description in words by Athenaeus tell us anything about the taste of the “Phrygian figs,” or the “Lydian figs,” or the smell of the “Phrygian odor” [Deipnosophistae, III, 75, 76 and XIV, 626].

2 Athenaeus. Op. cit., XIV, 624-626.

3 Heinrich Glarean, Dodecachordon, trans., Clement Miller (American Institute of Musicology, 1965), I, 155ff.

4 Johann Mattheson, Der vollkommene Capellmeister (1739), trans., Ernest Harriss (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1981), I, ix.

5 Henry Cornelius Agrippa, De occulta Philosophia, II, xxvi.. The best modern edition, which is highly recommended, is Donald Tyson, Three Books of Occult Philosophy (St. Paul: Llewellyn Publications, 1993).

6 Politica, 1342a.

7 Probemata, XIX, 48; Politica, VIII, 5, 7.

8 Politica, 1342a.27 and 1342b.14.

9 Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, XIV, 624-626.

10 Erasmus quoting Apuleius in “Adages,” in The Collected Works of Erasmus (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992), XXXIII, 283ff.

11 Ornithoparchus, Musicae active mirologus and Dowland, Introduction: Containing the Art of Singing (New York: Dover, 1973), 156.

12 Glarean, Dodecachordon, trans., Clement Miller (American Institute of Musicology, 1965), I, 130.

13 Quoted in Lorenzo Bianconi, Music in the Seventeenth Century, trans., David Bryant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 288.

14 “The Second Oration Concerning the Fortune or Virtue of Alexander the Great.”

15 Republic, III, 398e.

16 Hucbald, “Melodic Instruction” in Hucbald, Guido, and John on Music, trans., Warren Babb (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978),

17 Problemata, 922b.10.

18 “Concerning Music.” Plutarch clams this mode was introduced by the woman lyric poet, Sappho (c. 640 – 550 BC).

19 Ibid., 39.

20 “Concerning Music.”

21 The Ecclesiazusae, 881.

22 The Supplices, 69, trans., Gilbert Murray, The Complete Plays of Aeschylus (London: George Allen, 1952).

23 The Trojan Women, 510.

24 Iphigenia in Aulis, 574.

25 Quoted in Sir Arthur Pickard-Cambridge, The Dramatic Festivals of Athens (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953), 263, 265.

26 The Knights, 990.

27 Quoted in Plutarch in “Concerning Music.” Athenaeus (Op. cit., xiv, cap. 31) says that Pronomus, the Theban, was the first who played three kinds of music upon one aulos; and that before him players used separate instruments for each.

28 Chamaeleon, quoted by Archytas of Mytilene, quoted by Athenaeus, in Op. cit., XIII, 600.

29 Ornithoparchus, Musicae active mirologus and Dowland, Introduction: Containing the Art of Singing (New York: Dover, 1973), 156.

30 Glarean, Dodecachordon, trans., Clement Miller (American Institute of Musicology, 1965),, I, 153.

31 Ibid., I, 129.

32 Giovanni Battista Doni, Compendio del trattato de’ generi e de’ modi (Rome, 1635).

33 Harmonie universelle, V, vii, 30.

34 Protagoras, 326b.

35 Republic, III, 397c.

36 Ibid., III, 398e. In Laches, 188d, Plato remarks that the Dorian is the true Hellenic mode.

37 “Politica,” 1340a.40. The “facts” Aristotle refers to here are unknown today.

38 Ibid., 1342a27 and 1342b.14.

39 Henry H. Chamberlin, Last Flowers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1937).

40 Henry H. Chamberlin, Last Flowers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1937), 67ff.

41 Ibid., I, 164ff.

42 Mattheson, Op. cit., I, ix, 47.

43 Das Neu-Eroffnete Orchestre (Hamburg, 1713), 231ff.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 693

(See The Music of Ancient Greece: An Encyclopaedia, Michaelides, Solon, Faber, 1978, pp. 335–340: "Tonos". Τόνος may refer to a pitch, an interval, a "key" or register of the voice, or a mode.)
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 692

''plural Tonoi, concept in ancient Greek music, pertaining to the placement of scale patterns at different pitches and closely connected with the notion of octave species (q.v.). Through transposition of the Greater Perfect System (comprising two octaves descending from the A above middle C to the second A below) to a higher or lower pitch level, each tonos causes a different octave…''
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 691

Michaelides, Solon, The Music of Ancient Greece: An Encyclopaedia (London: Faber, 1978)
This is an essential tool in the study of Ancient Greek Music (Greek edition: Athens, 1989). It is presented in the form of a dictionary with extensive and detailed entries.
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 690


You are here: HomePage| Notebook (articles)| Greek Music| Selection of Titles on Ancient Greek Music|
Bibliography Selection for Ancient Greek Music
Albrecht, Michael von et Werner Schubert, edd., Musik in Antike und Neuzeit (Bern: Lang, 1987)
We owe the initiative for the publication of this collection of essays to the Heidelberg Seminar on Classic Literature; the work represents the seminar’s contribution to the 600th anniversary of the Heidelberg University. The texts document the pursuits of the ‘Music Score Archives on the influence of Antiquity in modern times music’ (Notenarchiv zum Fortwirken der Antike in der Musik der Neuzeit), founded by Joachim Draheim. The essays discuss issues on music archaeology (E. Eibner, “Music life during the Hallstatt period: considerations about music based on representations”); on ancient music theories (F. Zaminer: “On the meaning of ‘pitch’ from Antiquity to modern times”); on organology (E. Poehlmann, “The two Elgin lyres at the British Museum”); and even the assimilation of the impact of Ancient Greek Music in modern times (M. von Albrecht, “Music and Rhetoric in Goethe and Quintilianus”).
Anderson, Warren D., Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, c1966)
Anderson’s classic monograph examines the educational, ethical and philosophical dimension in music for the Greeks from Pindar, Plato and Aristotle to the Papyrus Hibeh 13 and Philodemus. Anderson was the first to question the excessive importance attributed to Damon in the history of the ethos theory (e.g. in Abert and Lasserre, see title no. 34).

__________, Music and Musicians in Ancient Greece (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994)
Anderson’s more recent book completes the first one and studies the surviving evidence on the practice of music. The central part of the book refers essentially to the 5th century BC with various references however to earlier and later periods. The subject is developed chronologically from the Stone Age and the so-called Dark Ages (from 1100 to 900 BC) to the times of Plato and Aristotle.
Arrighetti, Graziano, Gigante, Marcello και Kleve, Knut, edd., Cronache Ercolanesi no. 19 (Napoli: Gaetano Macchiaroli, 1989)
The 1989 yearbook of the Herculaneum Papyri International Research Centre includes Daniel Delattre’s text “Philodemus’ On Music: 4th book, columns 40 to 109” and James Porter’s “Content and form in Philodemus” which studies the very interesting theory on aesthetics and poetry as exposed by Philodemus and his opponents (known as ‘critics’).

Barbera, André, The Euclidian Division of the Canon: Greek and Latin Sources (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991)
The new analytical texts in this edition study sources that were unknown at the time of the Menge publication in 1916, and proceed to the most reliable reconstitution of the three main versions of the text: the main version in Greek with the written ascription to Euclides or Cleoneides, the shorter version in Greek which is included in the comments of Porphyry in Ptolemy’s Harmonics and the Latin version of Boethius included in his Institutio Musica.

________ , ed., Music Theory and its Sources: Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Notre Dame Conferences in Medieval Studies I
(Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990)
This volume includes highly important articles by André Barbera, Thomas Mathiesen and Jon Solomon on the duties and conjectures of modern reviewers of ancient Greek texts on music and music theory. The reconstruction of an ideal prototype is a chimera, Barbera sums up: the ‘texts’ are ‘organic’ compositions, ‘experience stories’ in successive layers, an important factor that should be pointed out in modern editions.

Barker, Andrew, Greek Musical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)
A selection with translation and comments on the sources of Ancient Greek Music. Barker aspires to render all the sources on Ancient Greek Music accessible to readers with no knowledge of Ancient Greek.

Bélis, Annie, Aristoxene de Tarante et Aristote: Le Traité d’harmonique, Études et commentaires 100 (Paris: Klincksieck, 1986)
This is a recent study on Aristoxenus of Tarentum and his Armonika (Elements of harmony), after the previous one by Laloy on the same subject (Paris 1904). Bélis extensively analyzes the contents of Aristoxenus’ treatise, ascertains the line of thought rather than the fragmentary character of the surviving document, points out the Aristotelian elements and highlights Aristoxenus’ founder’s role in treating the study of harmonics as a separate science.

___________, Les Hymnes á Apollon, École Francaise d’Athènes. Corpus des inscriptions de Delphes III (Paris: Diffusion de Boccard, 1992)
About twenty years after the publication of the work Denkmaeler der altgriechischen Musik (1970), which is the first work where the Delphic Hymns are presented ‘as they really were and not as one would wish they were’ (p. 24), Bélis publishes her own study using means and methods that were unknown to Poehlmann, and presents us with a reviewed and improved version of the two hymns, equipped with an extensive commentary on the text, the music and the music notation. Bélis identified the composer of the first hymn (article 19 in the Poehlmann edition) as Athinaios Athinaiou and dated both hymns to 128 BC.

Boldrini, Sandro, Prosodie und Metrik der Roemer, Teubner-Studienbuecher (Stuttgart:Teubner, 1999)
An excellent manual on metrics in classic Latin poetry with a concise reference to music.

Brancacci, Aldo et al., Aristoxenica, Menandrea Fragmenta, Philosophica, Studi e testi per il Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici Greci e Latini XCI (Firenze: Olschki,1988)
Luigi Enrico Rossi’s view on two papyrus fragments by Aristoxenus, one of them on harmonics and the other on metrics and rhythm. The author deems it possible that these two fragments are the work of a later writer, possibly of the Hellenistic period. The same volume includes the first-rate study of the Hibeh 13 Papyrus by Aldo Brancacci, in which the author questions the accepted chronology of the work and the authorship which is attributed to Ippias the Sophist; he convincingly maintains that the author of these fragments was the rhetorician Alkidamas, pupil of Gorgias and a contemporary of Antisthenes and Isocrates, who was an active figure in Athens from 390 to 365 BC.

Ceccarelli, Paola, La Pirrica nell'Antichita greco-romana: studi sulla danza armata, Filologia e critica. Collana diretta da Bruno Gentili (Pisa: IEPI, 1998)
Focusing on pyrrhic dance the author studies a number of sources from the entire Greek world of that period, including representations, texts and inscriptions. She devotes a special chapter to music (“on P. Vidal-Naquet’s insistence”, p. 7) in which she studies the information found in sources that deal with the distinction between pyrrhic metres and feet, instruments and the corresponding ethos.

Comotti, Giovanni, Music in Greek and Roman Culture,μτφ. R. Munson (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989) [τίτλος πρωτοτύπου: La musica nella cultura greca e romana (Torino: EDT, 1979)]
Comotti’s introduction to Ancient Greek Music is the first volume of a series of publications dedicated to the European History of Music as seen by the Italian Society of Musicology and aiming at the creation of manuals for the curriculum in musicology in Italian universities. Following the leading spirit of the series –described by Alberto Bosso in the prologue, but unfortunately not included in the English translation- Comotti’s objective is to present a panoramic view of the Greek and Roman worlds highlighting the role of music in society; in a dialectic and questioning -rather than aphoristic- manner, he deals with specific subjects (instruments and music theory). In conclusion, he gives a detailed analysis of the surviving fragments and submits a selection of translated documents and sources.

Dale, A.M., The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1948)
A classical and analytical review of the use of lyric metres in drama in Attica and decisive chapters on the formation of strophes, as well as information on performance.

D'Alfonso, Francesca, Stesicoro e la performance: studio sulle modalita esecutive dei carmi stesicorei, Filologia e critica 74 (Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale, 1994)
Yet another interesting research, in the sphere of influence generated by the famous modern Italian philologist Bruno Gentili, on the question of performance in Ancient Greek poetry. D’Alfonso refers to the modern controversial issue regarding the limits that should be applied in the traditional separation of Ancient Greek poetry between ‘chorus’ and ‘lyric’ poetry, and concludes corroborating the ancient evidence relative to the choral character in Stesichorus’ poetry.

Degering, Hermann, Die Orgel: Ihre Erfindung und ihre Geschichte bis zur Karolingerzeit (Muenster: Coppenrathsche Buchhandlung, 1905 / ανατ. της έκδ. Buren: Frits Knuf;1989)
A German translation of Greek and Latin texts and a detailed presentation of illustration sources for the hydraulic instrument of Antiquity.

Delavaud-Roux, Marie-Helene, Les Danses Pacifiques en Grece Antique (Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Universitι de Provence,1994)
A detailed study on the illustration sources of the various types of ancient Greek dances included in what Plato called ‘peaceful dances’, i.e. mainly women dances, not war dances or Dionysiac dances, such as the ‘kalasthikos’ and ‘geranos’ (or crane) dances, dances of married and unmarried women, wedding dances, funerary and drama dances, and so on. The volume includes a highly useful glossary on choreography (‘lexique chorégraphique’) and an equally useful index (‘répertoire’) of technical terms and dance names.

Drachmann, A.G., Ktesibios, Philon, and Heron: A Study in Ancient Pneumatics, Acta historica scientiarum naturalium et medicinalium IV (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1948)
A classic and one of the most important publications on Ancient technology in general, and on pneumatics and their application more specifically (e.g. hydraulis). The author focuses on Heron’s Pneumatics, which he believes to be a technician’s notebook, rather than a full treatise.

Drieberg, Friedrich von, Die griechische Musik auf ihre Gesetze zurueckgefuehrt (Berlin:Trautwein, 1841)
Drieberg (1780 – 1856) was a composer and a much published amateur researcher in Ancient Greek Music. His contemporaries (Chladni, Marx, and others) found his theories were the fruit of a vivid imagination. In the present work Dreiberg presents his answers to the unedited excerpts of his critics.

Duering, Ingemar, ed., Die Harmonielehre des Klaudios Ptolemaios, Elanders Goeteborgs Hoegskolas Arsskrift XXXVI (Goeteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, 1930)
New critical text on Ptolemy’s work.

__________________, ed., Porphyrios-Kommentar zur Harmonielehre des Ptolemaios, Goeteborgs Hoegskolas Arsskrift XXXVIII (Goeteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, 1932)
New critical text on Porphyrius’ work.

____________________ , Ptolemaios und Porphyrios ueber die Musik, Goeteborgs Hoegskolas Arsskrift XL (Goeteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, 1934)
Translation of Ptolemy’s Harmonics and extensive commentary of Ptolemy’s and Porphyrius’ texts.

Gentili, Bruno et Perusino, Franca, edd., Mousike: Metrica, ritmica e musica greca in memoria di Giovanni Comotti, Studi di metrica classica 11 (Pisa: IEPI, 1995)
A collection of essays dedicated to the memory of the great researcher of Ancient Greek Music, Giovanni Comotti (1931 – 1990), edited by Bruno Gentili, possibly today’s leading Italian philologist and previous collaborator of Comotti. The volume includes essays by E. Poehlmann, A. Barker, B. Gentili, D. Restani, R. Pretagostini and others. The collection is noted for its ‘holistic’ approach to the ancient Greek term ‘mousikê’.

Georgiades, Thrasybulos, Musik und Rhythmus bei den Griechen: Zum Ursprung der abendlaendischen Musik, Rowohlts deutsche Enzyklopaedie (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1958) and

____________________, Greek music, verse and dance [αγγλ. μτφ. του Der griechische Rhythmus] (New York: Merlin Press, c1955)
Despite their somewhat old-fashioned character, Georgiades’ theories remain interesting from a scholarly point of view and stand out for their strong argumentation. Both books share the same basis: the 1947 Habilitationsschrift on ‘Greek rhythm’, the origin of the modern distinction between music, prose and poetry deriving from the general single ancient Greek term ‘music’; the surviving of ancient prosody in modern Greek dance and the relation of the ‘kalamatianó’ dance with the dactylic hexameter, and so on.

Glau, Katherina, Rezitation griechischer Chorlyrik: die Parodoi aus Aischylos' Agamemnon und Euripides' Bakchen als Tonbeispiel auf CD mit Text- und Begleitheft (Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1998)
Recording of two choruses from Ancient Greek drama, with comments and an accompanying text in the original version and in a German translation. The students in the Classic Seminar in Heidelberg choose specific parts (Parodoi) from the choruses in Euripides’ Bacchae and Aeschylus’ Agamemnon as being respectively characteristic of the more ancient and the more modern aspects in rhythm; they proceeded to stage both versions in an effort to physically grasp the difficulties of performance in chorus poetry. As Glau points out, the rendition was based on the ‘acknowledged but in part out-dated’ (p. 30) theories of Westphal.

Greaves, Denise Davidson, ed., Sextus Empiricus: ΠΡΟΣ ΜΟΥΣΙΚΟΥΣ. Α new critical text and translation on facing pages, with an introduction, annotations, and indices verborum and nominum et rerum, Greek and Latin Music Theory (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1986)
This is a new critical edition based on the comparison of 25 manuscripts – instead of 8 as was the case in former editions- of the work on music by the 2nd century AD Sceptic philosopher, Sextus Empiricus.

Grenfell, Bernard et Hunt, Arthur, edd., The Hibeh Papyri Part I (London: Egypt Exploration Society, 1906)
This is the first description, publication and translation (into English) of the famous Hibeh Papyri 13 with treatise excerpts on Harmonics and the ethical influence in music. The reviewers suggest Ippias as the possible author, but are challenged in this by Croenert who favours the young Isocrates and dates the work to around about 390. More recently, the authorship has been bestowed on Alkidamas (see title no. 11)

Heinrichs, Albert, "Warum soll ich denn tanzen?": Dionysisches im Chor der griechischen Tragoedie, Lectio Teubneriana IV (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1996)
This is the text of a conference organized by the well-known Teubner publishers on 24.3.1995. The author studies the chorus in ancient tragedy in the light of group chorus as the central diachronic phenomenon in Greek life.

Jan, Carl von, ed., Musici scriptores graeci (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1995, ανατ. ά έκδ.1895)
Jan’s work consists of the first modern philological version of the ancient Greek texts by music theorists which replaced the Meibom edition of 1652. It includes: Aristotelian excerpts on music, the pseudo-Aristotelian Problems relative to music, excerpts from Euclid’s Division of the canon, Cleonides’ Introduction to harmonics, the Manual on Harmonics of Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Introduction to the Art of Music by Bacchius the senior, Gaudentius’ Introduction to Harmonics, Alypius’ Introduction to Music and the ‘excerpta Neapolitana’. The volume, in a modern transcription, presents all the music fragments that were known in Jan’s time.

Jonker, G.H., ed. & transl., The Harmonics of Manuel Bryennius (Groningen:Wolters - Noordhoff, 1970)
This is a modern version of Manuel Bryennius’ Harmonics (after a first edition by John Wallis in 1699). In his ‘Introduction’ Jonker presents the life, work and influence of Bryennius, studies the various modern opinions on the relation between The Harmonics and Pachimeres’ chapter on music, and determines Bryennius’ role in the Ancient Greek music theory tradition on the one hand, and on the other hand, his role as witness of his time (cf. in particular Bryennius’ comparison between the ancient Greek ‘tropoi’ and the Byzantine modes or ‘ichoi’).

Koller, Ernst, Musse und musische Paideia: άber die Musikaporetik in der aristotelischen Politik (Basel: Schwabe, 1956)
A study on music as presented in Aristotle’s Politics and the role it is ascribed in the ideal democratic state (προς παιδείαν, παιδίαν, διαγωγήν)

Landels, John, Music in Ancient Greece and Rome (London: Routledge, 1999)
Landels is known for his interest in ancient technology. He gives a general outline of ancient Greek and Roman music with emphasis on the technical means and the properties of the music instruments.

Lasserre, Francois, Plutarque: De la musique. Texte, traduction, commentaire précédés d’une étude sur L' éducation musicale dans la Grece antique, (Olten: Urs Graf,1954)
Laserre’s work takes into account Ziegler’s book which was published just one year earlier (Teubner, 1953). Its main value lies more in the study of musical education and the education of ethos, focusing on Damon, than in the critical version and translation of the text. Laserre’s view in attributing an influence in this work to Dionysus of Halicarnassus and thereby dating it to a later period -between 170 and 300 AD- has not been generally accepted.

Lawler, Lilian B., The Dance in Ancient Greece (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1964)
Lawler’s classic study is a diachronic survey of the Greek world, since pre-historic Crete to the later Roman times; her work also includes modern studies on the various roles of dance in orgy, drama and professional acting.

Levin, Flora R., The Manual of Harmonics of Nicomachus the Pythagorean. Translation and Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press, 1994)
This is an English translation of Nicomachus of Gerasa’s work, with an introduction and an extensive commentary.

Lippman, Edward A., Musical Thought in Ancient Greece (New York: Columbia University Press,1964)
Lippman’s general interest in the aesthetics of music leads him to study the beginnings of the aesthetical, ethical and philosophical outlook in Greek music. The main part of this work deals with the Pythagoreans, Plato, Aristotle and the Peripatetic School (Aristoxenus, Theophrastus), but leaves out later developments (Philodemus, Sextus, pseudo-Plutarch).

Lohmann, Johannes, Mousike und Logos: Aufsaetze zur griechischen Philosophie und Musiktheorie (Stuttgart: Musikwissenschaftliche Verlags-Gesellschaft, 1970)
This volume –edited by Anastasios Giannaras- presents Lohmann’s studies on Ancient Greek Music. The writer, famous for his publications in the field of Linguistics and Language Philosophy, sheds new light on the subject of Greek attitude to music through an etymological approach, which is also a history of ideas that leads to the analysis of archaic beginnings in Greek thought. Lohmann focuses his research in the history of terms, a pivotal historiographic central theme that emerged in the spiritual environment of Freiburg-im-Breisgau (Gurlitt, Eggebrecht) which was to result later in the Handwoerterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie (Freiburg, 1972 - )

Mathiesen, Thomas, Ancient Greek Music Theory: A Catalogue Raisonee of Manuscripts, Repertoire International des Sources Musicales [RISM] B11 (Muenchen: Henle, 1988)
This is one of the most valuable references in the study of Ancient Greek Music. In it Mathiesen draws up a complete–as far as possible - catalogue of the manuscripts on the theory of Ancient Greek Music, with commentaries and chronologies, and with references to the incipit and explicit of their contents.

____________, Greek Views On Music (New York: Norton, 1998) από το: ed. Leo Treitler, Source Readings In Music History (1st vol.)
In this new version of the classic anthology by Oliver Strunk (Norton, 1950), the first volume on Ancient Greek Music is edited by Mathiesen who explains in his Introduction why the view (singular) in the old version has been replaced by views (in the plural) in the new version.

Meibom, M., ed., Antiquae Musicae Auctores Septem (Amsterdam: Elzevir, 1652)
Meibom’s edition was until about 1900 the only standard version of the theory of music as stated in ancient Greek documents.

Monro, D. B., The Modes of Ancient Greek Music (Oxford: Clarendon Press,1894)
An important study on the tonal system in Ancient Greek Music, in which modern tools from the field of philology are first introduced. Monro, and Gombosi after him, maintained that the 5th and 6th centuries BC harmonies (or modes) had nothing to do with Aristoxenus’ modes (είδη δια πασών), and rejected the common view that the latter were but a codification of the former. Nowadays, the study of the relation between these two different modes underlines the earlier pioneering stage of the harmonies (see booktitle Winnington-Ingram, R. P., Mode in Ancient Greek Music).

Morelli, J., ed., Aristidis oratio adversus Leptinem. Libanii declamatio pro Socrate. Aristoxeni rhythmicorum elementorum fragmenta (Venezia: C. Palesio, 1785)
The first modern, and for a long time unique, version of Aristoxenus’ Rythmicon.

Murr, Christoph G, von, Philodem/ von der Musik./ Ein Auszug aus dessen viertem Buche./Ein Auszug aus dessen viertem Buche/Aus dem Griechischen einer Herkulanischen Papyrusrolle/uebersetzt/von/Christoph Gottlieb von Murr./Nebst einer Probe des Hymnenstils altgriechischer Musik./Mit zwo Kupfertafeln/Berlin 1806./Bei Heinrich Froehlich.
Still under the impact of the sensational discovery of the Herculaneum Papyrii (1752-54), the historian, jurist and art critic C. G. von Murr (1733 – 1811) publishes, translates and comments excerpts from Philodemus’ On Music, Book IV. An analysis on the “style of the hymns” in Ancient Greek Music is included in this same volume, where the author based on music style criteria and with much insight questions –for the first time ever- the authenticity of the music for Pindar’s first Pythian Ode as noted in Athanasius Kircher’s Musurgia Universalis (Rome, 1650).

Neubecker, Annemarie Jeanette, Die Bewertung der Musik bei Stoikern und Epikureern: Eine Analyse von Philodemus Schrift de Musica Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Veroeffentlichung Nr. 5 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1956) and

________________________, ed., Philodemus: ueber die Musik IV. Buch (Napoli: Bibliopolis,1986)
Thirty years later, Neubecker reviews her analysis on Peri Mousikis (On Music), Book IV by the Epicurean philosopher Philodemus (ca. 110 – 40 BC), which was the basis of her 1956 thesis on the ethic value of music in the works of Stoic and Epicurean philosophy.

_________________________, Altgriechische Musik: Eine Einfuehrung (Darmstadt: WBG, 1977)]
A first-rate introduction to Ancient Greek Music in the same spirit as the WBG (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) series Introductions on various modern fields of research: a detailed reference to the literature works and to the then up-dated (1977) bibliography with indications in the chapters on the role of music in everyday life, music theory and practice, and the ethical evaluation of music.

Neumaier, Wilfried, Antike Rythmustheorien: Historische Form und aktuelle Substanz (Amsterdam: Gruener, 1989)
This is a comprehensive survey of the various systematization methods on metres and rhythms in ancient music theory, from Plato to Augustine. The study is concerned by a clearly systematic need to discover a common denominator to all the theories on rhythm (see title of last chapter: ‘The hyper-historical essence in ancient rhythm’)

Paquette, Daniel, L'instrument de musique dans la ceramique de la Grece antique, Université de Lyon II - Publications de la Bibliothéque Salomon Reinach IV (Paris: Diffusion de Boccard, 1984)
An exhaustive illustrated documentation on Ancient Greek Music instruments.

Paratore, Ettore, Musica e poesia nell'antica Roma (Cremona: Fondazione Claudio Monteverdi, 1981)
This work is an attempt to re-establish elements in Roman music tracing them back to music features in the metrics of theatre (Plautus, Seneca) and lyric (Catullus, Statius) writers.

Parker, LP.E., The Songs of Aristophanes (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997)
Using as starting point the recognition of Classic Athens as ‘song culture’ and in an effort to fill in the gap in our understanding of Ancient comedy due to our ignorance of the music that went with it, Parker applies himself to the study of the metres used by Aristophanes, which, as he points out, is “what comes closest to a music score” (page 5).

Paul, Oscar, Boethius und die griechische Harmonik: Des Anicius Manlius Severinus Boetius Fuenf Buecher ueber die Musik aus der lateinischen in die deutsche Sprache uebertragen und mit besonderer Beruecksichtigung der griechischen Harmonik sachlich erklaert (Leipzig: Leuckart,1872; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1985)
Paul’s classic German translation and study of Boethius’ Institutio musica.

Pearson, Lionel, ed., Elementa rhythmica: the fragment of book II and the additional evidence for Aristoxenean rhythmic theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press,1990)
Pearson’s edition supersedes that of Pighi (Bologna, 1959) which is a simple copy of Westphal’s problematic edition (see title no. 70). However, the use of Aristoxenean theory in choruses of the classic period (Euripides, Sofocles, Pindar) does not find many supporters (see Poehlmann, under “Griechenland”, in the recent MMG [Stuttgart and so on, 1995]).
Perrot, Jean, The Organ from its Invention in the Hellenistic Period to the End of the Thirteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press,1971)
Perrot’s study remains the most complete and updated monograph on the hydraulis, from its invention in Hellenistic times to its use in the Middle-Ages (East and West). An extremely useful handbook in which the author presents us with all the sources, documents and illustrations on this subject.

Poehlmann, Egert, Denkmaeler altgriechischer Musik: Sammlung, Uebertragung und Erlaeuterung aller Fragmente und Faelschungen (Erlangen: Hans Carl,1970)
This is a critical edition of all the fragments and false inscriptions of Ancient Greek Music known at the time of publication. It was superseded later by the Poehlmann and West Oxford University Press version with all the more recent additional data (see corresponding entry).
Reinach, Theodore, La musique grecque (Paris: Payot, 1926)
A classic introduction to Ancient Greek Music with all the data known at the time of publication.

Restani, Donatella, ed., Musica e mito nella Grecia antica, Polifonie: Musica e spettacolo nella storia (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1995)
A selection of old and new articles in an Italian translation. The editor explains in her ‘Introduction’ that the choice and structure of the volume does not follow a traditional order in the history of music but is based on an anthropological approach to Ancient Greek Music. Her work includes articles by H. Abert, H. Kolller, G. Dumezil, J.-P. Vernant, A. Belis, M. Detienne and others.
Rios, Rosetta da. ed., Aristoxeni Elementa Harmonica (Roma: POP,1954)
This is the critical edition of Aristoxenus’ Armonika (Harmonics) which replaced Meibom’s classic. A second volume includes an Italian translation with comments with tables and music examples.

Sachs, Carl, Rise of Music in the Ancient World: East and West, New York: Norton, 1943)
In this classic manual Sachs compiles the work of about forty years research and publication of articles in various fields. Sachs characteristically approaches the study of Ancient Greek Music within the context of all great civilizations in the Eastern Mediterranean, and with a specific angle on its rise and development through the study of various phenomena.

Schlesinger, Kathleen, The Greek Aulos: A Study of its Mechanism and of its Relation to the Modal System of Ancient Greek Music (London: Methuen, 1939)
A milestone in the study of the Greek aulos which however is superseded today by the results of more recent research both on the theory of Ancient Greek Music and on the actual reconstruction of the flutes (in particular the distance between the holes on the instrument). The evidence included in this study from popular music in other cultures is of special historical interest.

Schueller, Herbert M., The Idea of Music: An Introduction to Musical Aesthetics In Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Early Drama, Art, and Music Monograph Series 9 (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications,1988)
Schueller’s study is a very useful handbook for those studying medieval music and are interested in the sources of medieval music aesthetics, as well as for students of Ancient Greek Music (in particular the first half of the book that comes under the title: “The Idea of Music in Ancient Europe”). More specifically, the author undertakes to describe in a chronological order the ‘adventures’ of ‘the idea of music’. The subchapter ‘Hebraism and Hellenism’ is particularly interesting for the role it attributes to the influence of Philon of Alexandria on the ‘Pateriki’ appreciation of music.

Scott, William C., Musical Design in Aeschylian Theater, (Hanover: University Press of New England,1984) and

_______________, Musical Design in Sophoclean Theater,> (Hanover: University Press of New England,1996)
The author begins by stating his practical interest in modern staging of Greek tragedies based on the key role of the chorus, a basic aspect of the drama, and its impact on the successful development of the play. The author studies, in Aeschylus and Sophocles, the use the chorus makes of metrical music techniques (repetitions, metric variations), and assesses their influence on shaping and supporting the meaning of the poetic text.
Sicking, C.M.J., Griechische Verslehre, Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft II/4 (Muenchen: Beck,1993)
The title, ‘Greek verse teachings’– and not metrical- is significant: Sicking undertakes to make a critical summary of all the relevant theories from Westphal to our days and suggests a rethinking of the κατά μέτρον and κώλα view which, as the author convincingly demonstrates, leads to misconceptions regarding the ‘rhythmic profile’ of verses; he makes valuable comments on the effect of melody and the changes it causes in this field. We quote from the Epilogue: “It has been ascertained that the rhythmic profile of verse is not defined by the metrical –in the modern sense of the word- arrangement of the verse elements or their fusion through metric (or κώλα) recurrence, but is mainly defined by their linear sequence.” Sicking’s work, part of the historical Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, is the most updated study on this subject.

Torr, Cecil, On the Intepretation of Greek Music (London: Frowde, 1896· ανατ. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI)
This brief review on Ancient Greek Music notation makes a specific reference to the evaluation of intervals and the notation of values. The author makes a belligerent remark against those who interpret and evaluate Ancient Greek Music without taking pains to acquire sufficient knowledge of the original.

Wallace, Robert W. et Bonnie MacLachlan, edd., Harmonia Mundi: Musica e filosofia nell’ antichitα, Biblioteca di Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica (Roma: Edizioni dell’ Ateneo, 1991)
The essays in this volume were first read at the symposium on Ancient Greek Music and Philosophy which took place on May 25th 1989 at the American Academy in Rome. These essays included the following: “Music and philosophy in Antiquity” and “Damon and his followers: an analysis of the sources” by R. W. Wallace; “The harmony of the spheres: dulcis sonus”, by B. McLachlan; “Pythagoras, Ippasos, Lasos and the experimental method”, by Giovanni Comotti; “Aristoxenus and the Ethnoethical Modes”, by John Thorp; “Epicurean elements in nature and ethics in Philodemus of Gadara’s music theory”, by Gioia M. Rispoli; “Logos and feeling in Ptolemy’s Harmonics”, by Andrew Barker; “Pindar and the Sphinx: Celtic Polyphony and Greek Music”, by Frederick Ahl.

Wegner, Max, Musik und Tanz, Archaeologia homerica - Band III, Kapitel U (Goettingen:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht,1968)
A chapter on music in the context of a general study in Wegner’s Archaeologia homerica which comprises other chapters on Athletics, Writing, Worship, and so on, with as a central piece the material culture in Homeric times. Wegner sums up the results of his research by affirming the unequivocal functional character of music (Gebrauchmusik) and dance during the Geometric period (ca 900 to 700 BC). Wegner’s work is the most significant study to date on music in Homeric times.

Wellesz, Egon, ed., Ancient and Oriental Music, New Oxford History of Music, τ. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, c1957)
In this first volume of the Oxford New History of Music Greek-Roman music is studied alongside with Oriental cultures. The article on Ancient Greek Music, by Isobel Henderson, is still of great significance in the synoptic and precise survey it makes of the various complicated aspects involved in the study of Ancient Greek Music. The merit of the article is particular obvious on subjects such as the notation of music, one of the best introduction in this field.

West, Martin L., Ancient Greek Music (Oxford: Oxford University Press,1992)
This publication is the latest inclusive presentation of Ancient Greek Music and confirms the definite turn towards music sources –as opposed to the former attitude which concentrated mainly on documents- that general research on the subject has taken in the last twenty years or so. This is partly due to the emphasis in the publication of more recently discovered music fragments (about 80 fragments edited by West and Poehlmann are now in print at the Oxford University Press) and partly due to alternative approaches in the study of Ancient Greek Music, such as Ethnomusicology to name but one.

Westphal, Rudolf, Aristoxenos von Tarent: Melik und Rhythmik des classischen Hellenentums (Leipzig: Teubner,1883· ανατ. Hildesheim: Olms,1965))
Westphal dedicated many years of his life to the study of Aristoxenus of Tarent (“For over thirty years, there was hardly a week when I didn’t study Aristoxenus”, page V). The author backs up most of his studies of Ancient Greek Music and his results thereof on the bulk of the Elements of Rhythm and elements of Harmony. The two volumes of this work include translations and analytical editions of Aristoxenus’ writings, as well as Westphal’s own theories.

______________, Die Fragmente und die Lehrsaetze der griechischen Rhythmiker (Leipzig: Teubner, 1861)
Analytical version in a Latin translation and extensive commentaries on Aristoxenus’ Rhythmika (Elements of Rhythm), and fragments on rhythm by Dionysius, Bacchius, Aristides Quintillianus, M. Capella, M. Psellos and the “Parisian Fragments”.

Westphal, Rudolf και Hugo Gleditsch, Allgemeine Theorie der griechischen Metrik, Theorie der musischen Kuenste der Hellenen (Leipzig: Teubner, 1887)
A monumental and to date still accurate work on the value of metrics in Antiquity, despite Westphal attempts to centre all metric phenomena on one single principle, that of ‘Gleichtaktigkeit’; this view was to be abandoned on the basis of Wilamowitz’s critical work. A more ‘descriptive’ theory is now preferred to Westphal’s systematic one.

Wille, Guenther, Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Roemer (Amsterdam: Schippers, 1967)
Wille’s unique and monumental work (800 pages) was and continues to be a landmark. His work presents the richest concentration of elements –in theory as well as in practice- in all the fields of Ancient Roman Music, the influence of Greece, the link between music and literature, and references to the relevant sources from the first Latin inscriptions to Isidore of Sevilla’s Etymologiae (ca 560 to 636 AD).

Winnington-Ingram, R. P., Mode in Ancient Greek Music (Amsterdam: Hakkert,1968· ανατ. της έκδ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936)
A highly significant contribution to the understanding of the complex questions on the theory of Ancient Greek Music: the differences between τόνος (tone), τρόπος (mode) and είδη δια πασών, the link between tones in Aristoxenus and classic harmonies, and so on. Winnington-Ingram offers a scholarly study of both the documents and the surviving fragments. His investigation (to find reliable music proof for the 6th and 5th centuries harmonies, considered as forerunners of the είδη δια πασών) has lost none of its acumen (cf. West, 1992).
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 689

THE MUSIC AND TONE-SYSTEMS OF ANCIENT GREECE
SHIRLAW Music and Letters.1951; XXXII: 131-139
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 688

''Discussion of Barker’s Intro’s remarks on the inferential harmoniai and the tonoi. In both cases question arise as to what Barker’s evidence is for his assertions, and his support for one alternative among many in various cases. Original sources are lacking. Some of this debate we deferred until we shall have all read the rest of his texts, e.g. Aristides Quintilianus and Ptolemy. One interesting issue that came up: what exactly does it mean to change harmonia or tonos? Does a change really necessitate retuning as Barker says, or might it mean a simple repositioning within the system, perhaps including tunes “wrapping around” (when interval series are rotated) bringing the intervals pushed off the top of the system back in at the bottom, as in some gamelan music? We would need a Greek theory of melody to answer this. We’ll see what Aristoxenos brings.''
spiroslyra Creative Commons License 2008.07.30 0 0 687


* Harmonia and Ethos in Ancient Greek Music
* Thomas J. Mathiesen
* The Journal of Musicology, Vol. 3, No. 3 (Summer, 1984), pp. 264-279 (article consists of 16 pages)
* Published by: University of California Press

Ha kedveled azért, ha nem azért nyomj egy lájkot a Fórumért!